Loading…
The requirement that every guardian annually completes and returns to the court a status report (Probate Code §1513.2(a), CRC 7.1003 and Local Rule 4.77.13) is suspended pending further order of the court; nothing limits the court from ordering a guardian to appear or to file a status report at any time.
California > First Appellate District > San Mateo County > Superior Court of California, County of San Mateo
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN MATEO SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN MATEO Standing Order 14- 127 Standing Order Suspending Compliance and Enforcement of the Annual Status Report Described in Probate Code § 1513.2 and Local Rule 4.77.13 Due to the lack of available resources, and pending restoration of funding and available staff and/or technological resources, and GOOD CAUSE APPEARING THEREFORE, and in accordance with Probate Code §1513.2(a), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED THAT the requirement that every guardian annually completes and returns to the court a status report as described in Probate Code §1513.2(a), CRC 7.1003 and Local Rule 4.77.13 is hereby suspended pending further order of the court, and IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED THAT until such time as the court vacates this suspension order, each court appointed guardian shall notify the court in writing of any significant change in circumstances impacting their ability to continue in their capacity as guardian, including, but not limited to: 1. Guardian’s address and telephone number; 2. If the ward is no longer in the guardian’s home, why the ward was moved and the name, relationship, address, and telephone number of the person or persons with whom the child resides; 3. Any significant physical or mental health issues of the guardian or ward impacting the ability of the guardian to continue in their capacity as guardian; 4. Any significant change, traumatic event, or major disruption impacting the ward or the guardian’s ability to continue in their capacity as guardian; and 5. The guardian’s inability to continue their duties and obligations as the child’s guardian. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED THAT nothing herein shall limit the court from ordering a guardian to appear before the court and/or to file a status report as described in Probate Code §1513.2(a) at any time. Dated: July 29 2014 IT IS SO ORDERED: HON. ROBERT D. FOILES PRESIDING JUDGE
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN MATEO SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN MATEO Standing Order 14- 127 Standing Order Suspending Compliance and Enforcement of the Annual Status Report Described in Probate Code § 1513.2 and Local Rule 4.77.13 Due to the lack of available resources, and pending restoration of funding and available staff and/or tec
Reviewer note: Transcribed 2026-10-08 (California T4 San Mateo build 2026-10-08) by eye from BenchPath custody ca/t4/ca-san-mateo/docs/14-127.pdf (22662 bytes, sha256 686793f1df51132ff0baa3eba414a4ee03452d1655fee2cb7518c7121cf76e7a; 2 pages; a scan, page images, no text layer): read on the page images rendered at 200 dpi; checked against three machine readings never published (RapidOCR on each page, the file's own text layer where it has one and RapidOCR on each printed line): every 6-word window of the transcription looked up and each span no reading holds read again on the page image (evidence/vision-check-2026-10-08.log). The clerk's filed stamps, the signatures and the pleading paper's line numbers are not part of the text (a handwritten order number or date, or a stamped name, is carried where it fills the order's own line); the transcription's closing note, which describes them, is not published. Review note: The order suspends the guardian's annual status report "pending further order of the court"; Local Rule 4.77.13 (Review of Guardianship, carded) is in the book as amended effective July 1, 2026 - whether the suspension continues is a review task.
Standing order of the 109th Judicial District Court for every pending or later-filed case in Andrews, Winkler and Crane Counties: any attorney or self-represented litigant who uses any form of artificial intelligence for legal research or drafting in a case must, before using AI-generated information in a court submission or proceeding, sign and submit the court's certification form stating that all language, quotations, sources, citations, arguments and legal analysis created or contributed to by generative AI were verified as accurate by a human through traditional (non-AI) legal sources, and acknowledging responsibility and potential sanctions for their or their co-counsel's failure to comply. Effective immediately; in effect until rescinded or replaced.
Standing order of the 109th Judicial District Court for every pending or later-filed case in Andrews, Winkler and Crane Counties: any attorney or self-represented litigant who uses any form of artificial intelligence for legal research or drafting in a case must, before using AI-generated information in a court submission or proceeding, sign and submit the court's certification form stating that all language, quotations, sources, citations, arguments and legal analysis created or contributed to by generative AI were verified as accurate by a human through traditional (non-AI) legal sources, and acknowledging responsibility and potential sanctions for their or their co-counsel's failure to comply. Effective immediately; in effect until rescinded or replaced.