Loading…
No person other than a regularly sworn peace officer may enter the Hall of Justice and Records in Redwood City, the Court Annex building, the Courts' buildings in South San Francisco, San Mateo, Juvenile Hall or any other facility used by the court carrying a dangerous weapon, concealed or unconcealed (the order defines the term); no peace officer may enter a courtroom with a firearm, other than one the officer is wearing, that has not been secured or submitted to the bailiff for securing; a knowing violation is subject to the contempt process of the court and may be punishable by five days in jail and a fine of $500.00.
California > First Appellate District > San Mateo County > Superior Court of California, County of San Mateo
STANDING ORDER NO 97-1 SUPERIOR AND MUNICIPALCOURTS OF SAN MATEO COUNTY COUNTY OF SAN MATEO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN THE SUPERIOR AND MUNICIPAL COURTS COUNTY OF SAN MATEO ) ss. STATE OF CALIFORNIA STANDING ORDER RE: WEAPONS SECURITY By virtue of the authority vested in me by the California Rules of Court, the following order is issued effective forthwith: GOOD CAUSE APPEARING THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that no person, other than a regularly sworn peace officer shall enter the Hall of Justice and Records in Redwood City, the Court Annex building, the Courts’ buildings in South San Francisco, San Mateo, Juvenile Hall or any other facility used by the court, carrying a dangerous weapon, either concealed or unconcealed. A dangerous weapon is defined as any firearm, explosive device, gaseous or chemical device designed to be a weapon, knife of any sort wherein a blade is released by any type of mechanism, or any knife with a blade three inches or more in length, any ice pick, awl, dirk, dagger, stiletto, bayonette or similar sharp stabbing tool, any straight edged razor, or any cutting, stabbing or bludgeoning weapon or device intended to be used as a club or capable of inflicting grievous bodily harm. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that no peace officer is to enter a courtroom of the Superior and Municipal Courts of San Mateo County with any firearm, excluding firearms that a peace officer is wearing, that has not been secured or submitted to the bailiff for securing. Any person knowingly violating this order shall be subject to the contempt process of the court. A violation may be punishable by five days in jail and a fine of $500.00. This order shall supersede any previous order(s) and shall remain in effect indefinitely and until such time as the order is vacated or superseded by the Presiding Judge. Dated: 6-16-97 Mark R. Forcum, Presiding Judge
STANDING ORDER NO 97-1 SUPERIOR AND MUNICIPALCOURTS OF SAN MATEO COUNTY COUNTY OF SAN MATEO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN THE SUPERIOR AND MUNICIPAL COURTS COUNTY OF SAN MATEO ) ss. STATE OF CALIFORNIA STANDING ORDER RE: WEAPONS SECURITY By virtue of the authority vested in me by the California Rules of Court, the following order is issued effective forthwith: GOOD CAUSE APPEARING THEREFORE, IT IS HEREB
Reviewer note: Transcribed 2026-10-08 (California T4 San Mateo build 2026-10-08) by eye from BenchPath custody ca/t4/ca-san-mateo/docs/97-01.pdf (352061 bytes, sha256 d513efa3fda75fa831ff25675a3a6eca62d24ca886d4c770bd9870d6a3294c2b; 1 page; a scan, page images, no text layer): read on the page images rendered at 200 dpi; checked against three machine readings never published (RapidOCR on each page, the file's own text layer where it has one and RapidOCR on each printed line): every 6-word window of the transcription looked up and each span no reading holds read again on the page image (evidence/vision-check-2026-10-08.log). The clerk's filed stamps, the signatures and the pleading paper's line numbers are not part of the text (a handwritten order number or date, or a stamped name, is carried where it fills the order's own line); the transcription's closing note, which describes them, is not published.
Standing order of the 109th Judicial District Court for every pending or later-filed case in Andrews, Winkler and Crane Counties: any attorney or self-represented litigant who uses any form of artificial intelligence for legal research or drafting in a case must, before using AI-generated information in a court submission or proceeding, sign and submit the court's certification form stating that all language, quotations, sources, citations, arguments and legal analysis created or contributed to by generative AI were verified as accurate by a human through traditional (non-AI) legal sources, and acknowledging responsibility and potential sanctions for their or their co-counsel's failure to comply. Effective immediately; in effect until rescinded or replaced.
Standing order of the 109th Judicial District Court for every pending or later-filed case in Andrews, Winkler and Crane Counties: any attorney or self-represented litigant who uses any form of artificial intelligence for legal research or drafting in a case must, before using AI-generated information in a court submission or proceeding, sign and submit the court's certification form stating that all language, quotations, sources, citations, arguments and legal analysis created or contributed to by generative AI were verified as accurate by a human through traditional (non-AI) legal sources, and acknowledging responsibility and potential sanctions for their or their co-counsel's failure to comply. Effective immediately; in effect until rescinded or replaced.