Loading…
No eleven- or twelve-year-old may be housed in Juvenile Hall unless accused of a Welfare and Institutions Code section 707(b) offense or approved by a Superior Court judge, and no minor ten or younger without a judge's approval; Probation seeks approval first from the Supervising Judge of the Juvenile Justice Court, then another juvenile justice judge, then a dependency judge; wards under section 602 are exempt. The order replaces the standing orders of October 27, 1986 and April 27, 2009.
California > Sixth Appellate District > Santa Clara County > Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara > Juvenile Division
[File stamp: FILED, SEP 5 P 2:33 as stamped (the year is overprinted by the caption), David H. Yamasaki, Clerk of the Superior Court, County of Santa Clara, California, By: [signature], Deputy Clerk, Delia Bellot] IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA JUVENILE DIVISION STANDING ORDER This Order is intended to update and replace the Standing Orders dated and filed October 27th, 1986 and April 27th, 2009. A. No eleven or twelve year old shall be housed in Juvenile Hall unless one of the following conditions exist: (1) The minor is accused of committing on the crimes listed under Welfare and Institutions Code Section 707(b), or (2) The minor’s placement in Juvenile Hall is approved by a Superior Court Judge. B No minor ten years of age or under shall be housed in Juvenile Hall without approval of a Superior Court Judge. C. In seeking the approval of a Superior Court Judge, the Santa Clara County Probation Department shall first attempt to contact the Supervising Judge of the Juvenile Justice Court; then, if he or she is not available, one of the other Judges currently sitting on the Juvenile Justice Court; and then, if they are not available, one of the Judges currently sitting on the Juvenile Dependency Court. The purpose of this Order is to ensure that a current Juvenile Judge makes this decision. D. Minors who are wards of the Court pursuant to Welfare and Institutions Code Section 602 are exempted from the orders above. DATED: September 15th, 2009 [signature] The Honorable Patrick Tondreau Supervising Judge, Delinquency Court
[File stamp: FILED, SEP 5 P 2:33 as stamped (the year is overprinted by the caption), David H. Yamasaki, Clerk of the Superior Court, County of Santa Clara, California, By: [signature], Deputy Clerk, Delia Bellot] IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA JUVENILE DIVISION STANDING ORDER This Order is intended to update and replace the Standing Orders da
Reviewer note: Composed 2026-09-28 (California T3 Santa Clara build 2026-09-28) from BenchPath custody ca/t3/ca-santa-clara/juv/280djuvjustice.pdf (174116 bytes, sha256 f8b2fec4f2cb242b2def2cc8463b4c523b9418caadf4abe31e3e4de651e17471; 1 page) - the court's own posted PDF, a scan (its OCR text layer was not relied on): transcribed from the rendered page images, every page read against the image; a machine reading (RapidOCR) was used only as a second reader for a word-level diff, every difference classified (misreadings, the file stamp and caption overprints, pleading line numbers, page numbers and running footers omitted as chrome), and each line the machine reader skipped was re-read in a full-resolution crop; every quotation mark, apostrophe, dash and section sign checked in full-resolution crops; the file stamp and the signatures are bracketed. The file stamp prints the day as “5” where the order is dated September 15th, 2009; the stamp is transcribed as printed. Printed irregularities are kept as printed.
Standing order of the 109th Judicial District Court for every pending or later-filed case in Andrews, Winkler and Crane Counties: any attorney or self-represented litigant who uses any form of artificial intelligence for legal research or drafting in a case must, before using AI-generated information in a court submission or proceeding, sign and submit the court's certification form stating that all language, quotations, sources, citations, arguments and legal analysis created or contributed to by generative AI were verified as accurate by a human through traditional (non-AI) legal sources, and acknowledging responsibility and potential sanctions for their or their co-counsel's failure to comply. Effective immediately; in effect until rescinded or replaced.
Standing order of the 109th Judicial District Court for every pending or later-filed case in Andrews, Winkler and Crane Counties: any attorney or self-represented litigant who uses any form of artificial intelligence for legal research or drafting in a case must, before using AI-generated information in a court submission or proceeding, sign and submit the court's certification form stating that all language, quotations, sources, citations, arguments and legal analysis created or contributed to by generative AI were verified as accurate by a human through traditional (non-AI) legal sources, and acknowledging responsibility and potential sanctions for their or their co-counsel's failure to comply. Effective immediately; in effect until rescinded or replaced.