Loading…
Under Welfare and Institutions Code section 208.5 as re-enacted by Senate Bill 823, a person under 25 whose case originated in juvenile court remains in a juvenile facility unless the person is 19 or older and the juvenile court, considering the section 208.5(c)(1)–(5) factors, orders adult housing — including youth transferred to criminal court, until sentenced; juvenile-court warrants mean the person is taken to Juvenile Hall unless 25 or older, absent an arrest not originating in juvenile court; a person released on an adult matter and held only on a juvenile matter is housed in Juvenile Hall; and the Sheriff's Office works with the Juvenile Probation Department on immediate return.
California > Sixth Appellate District > Santa Clara County > Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara
[File stamp: FILED, MAY 13 2021, Clerk of the Court, Superior Court of CA County of Santa Clara, By: [signature], Deputy, T. Pierce] SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA SANTA CLARA COUNTY JUVENILE COURT DIVISION STANDING ORDER ORDER REQUIRING YOUTH UNDER THE AGE OF 25 TO BE HOUSED IN JUVENILE HALL (WIC §208.5) WHEN CASE ORIGINATED IN JUVENILE COURT On September 30, 2020, Senate Bill 823 went into effect. Among other things, SB823 repealed Welfare and Institutions Code §208.5, and added a new version. Under the new law, any person under 25 years of age held in secure detention whose case originated in juvenile court is to remain in a juvenile facility absent a determination by the juvenile court that the person is to be moved to an adult facility. It is hereby ordered: 1) All persons under the age of 25 whose case originated in juvenile court shall remain in a juvenile facility, unless the person is 19 years of age or older and the juvenile court, in considering the factors articulated in Welfare and Institutions Code section §208.5(c)(1)-(5), determines that the person should be housed in an adult facility. This includes youth who have been ordered transferred to criminal court after a judicial transfer hearing, unless and until they are sentenced. Any adult court sentence will be served in the appropriate adult facility. 2) Any outstanding warrants, including out of county warrants, issued by the juvenile court should be read to mean that person must be taken to Juvenile Hall unless the youth is 25 years of age or older, absent any additional arrest not originating in juvenile court which resulted in their secure detention in an adult facility. a. If the person has a pending adult legal matter and is released from an adult facility on their own recognizance or bail, such that they are only in custody on a juvenile matter, that person is to be housed in Juvenile Hall absent a juvenile court’s determination to the contrary. 3) The Santa Clara County Sheriff’s Office shall work with the Juvenile Probation Department to facilitate the immediate return to Juvenile Hall of any person under 25 years of age who is only in custody on a juvenile matter. SO ORDERED [signature] The Honorable Katherine Lucero Presiding Judge of the Juvenile Division Supervising Judge of the Juvenile Justice Division 5/13/2021 Date
[File stamp: FILED, MAY 13 2021, Clerk of the Court, Superior Court of CA County of Santa Clara, By: [signature], Deputy, T. Pierce] SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA SANTA CLARA COUNTY JUVENILE COURT DIVISION STANDING ORDER ORDER REQUIRING YOUTH UNDER THE AGE OF 25 TO BE HOUSED IN JUVENILE HALL (WIC §208.5) WHEN CASE ORIGINATED IN JUVENILE COURT On September 30, 2020, Senate Bill 823 went into effect.
Reviewer note: Composed 2026-09-28 (California T3 Santa Clara build 2026-09-28) from BenchPath custody ca/t3/ca-santa-clara/juv/539djuv_justice.pdf (143062 bytes, sha256 28c83bf5afa18771125e730a35dde81931d1ff40680e070d73f79de413be33d1; 1 page) - the court's own posted PDF, a scan (its OCR text layer was not relied on): transcribed from the rendered page images, every page read against the image; a machine reading (RapidOCR) was used only as a second reader for a word-level diff, every difference classified (misreadings, the file stamp and caption overprints, pleading line numbers, page numbers and running footers omitted as chrome), and each line the machine reader skipped was re-read in a full-resolution crop; every quotation mark, apostrophe, dash and section sign checked in full-resolution crops; the file stamp and the signatures are bracketed. The date under the signature is handwritten (“5/13/2021”); the word “originated” prints in bold italics. Printed irregularities are kept as printed.
Standing order of the 109th Judicial District Court for every pending or later-filed case in Andrews, Winkler and Crane Counties: any attorney or self-represented litigant who uses any form of artificial intelligence for legal research or drafting in a case must, before using AI-generated information in a court submission or proceeding, sign and submit the court's certification form stating that all language, quotations, sources, citations, arguments and legal analysis created or contributed to by generative AI were verified as accurate by a human through traditional (non-AI) legal sources, and acknowledging responsibility and potential sanctions for their or their co-counsel's failure to comply. Effective immediately; in effect until rescinded or replaced.
Standing order of the 109th Judicial District Court for every pending or later-filed case in Andrews, Winkler and Crane Counties: any attorney or self-represented litigant who uses any form of artificial intelligence for legal research or drafting in a case must, before using AI-generated information in a court submission or proceeding, sign and submit the court's certification form stating that all language, quotations, sources, citations, arguments and legal analysis created or contributed to by generative AI were verified as accurate by a human through traditional (non-AI) legal sources, and acknowledging responsibility and potential sanctions for their or their co-counsel's failure to comply. Effective immediately; in effect until rescinded or replaced.