Where the court's courtesy notices misstate the bail amount (fees due) on a traffic citation, effective March 12, 2019 the court accepts a lower stated amount as payment in full and collects only the actual amount due where the notice states more.
California > Sixth Appellate District > Santa Clara County > Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA STANDING ORDER FEES DUE FOR TRAFFIC CITATIONS The Santa Clara County Superior Court has learned that the bail amount (in other words, the fees due) for some traffic citations is incorrectly stated on courtesy notices sent out by the Court. In some cases, the notices reflect an amount that is less than the actual amount due on the case. In other cases, the notices reflect an amount that is more than the actual amount due on the case. Effective March 12, 2019: 1. For cases in which the notices reflect an amount that is less than the actual amount due, the Court will accept the amount reflected on the notices as payment in full for the applicable violation(s). 2. For cases in which the notices reflect an amount that is more than the actual amount due, the Court will collect only the actual amount due for the applicable violation(s). SO ORDERED. Dated: March 12, 2019 Hon. Deborah A. Ryan Presiding Judge of the Superior Court
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA STANDING ORDER FEES DUE FOR TRAFFIC CITATIONS The Santa Clara County Superior Court has learned that the bail amount (in other words, the fees due) for some traffic citations is incorrectly stated on courtesy notices sent out by the Court. In some cases, the notices reflect an amount that is less than the actual amount due on the case. In other ca
Reviewer note: Composed 2026-09-28 (California T3 Santa Clara build 2026-09-28) from BenchPath custody ca/t3/ca-santa-clara/standing-orderon-fees-stated-traffic-notices03-12-19.pdf (85083 bytes, sha256 9b9d966b1a6b8cf6592e1acb89a4b540ba24b17d07a490df70d10c620645430b; 1 page) with the shared verbatim composer: pleading line numbers, page numbers, running headers and footers removed as chrome, lines reflowed into the document's paragraphs; proof 1 (whitespace-only) and proof 2 (same character multiset as the text layer minus chrome) both pass.
Standing order of the 109th Judicial District Court for every pending or later-filed case in Andrews, Winkler and Crane Counties: any attorney or self-represented litigant who uses any form of artificial intelligence for legal research or drafting in a case must, before using AI-generated information in a court submission or proceeding, sign and submit the court's certification form stating that all language, quotations, sources, citations, arguments and legal analysis created or contributed to by generative AI were verified as accurate by a human through traditional (non-AI) legal sources, and acknowledging responsibility and potential sanctions for their or their co-counsel's failure to comply. Effective immediately; in effect until rescinded or replaced.
Standing order of the 109th Judicial District Court for every pending or later-filed case in Andrews, Winkler and Crane Counties: any attorney or self-represented litigant who uses any form of artificial intelligence for legal research or drafting in a case must, before using AI-generated information in a court submission or proceeding, sign and submit the court's certification form stating that all language, quotations, sources, citations, arguments and legal analysis created or contributed to by generative AI were verified as accurate by a human through traditional (non-AI) legal sources, and acknowledging responsibility and potential sanctions for their or their co-counsel's failure to comply. Effective immediately; in effect until rescinded or replaced.