Loading…
A standing motion of the District Attorney in the Justice Court of the Western Judicial District, Yreka Division, dated January 12, 1993 and granted by Roger T. Kosel, Judge of the Justice Court: all cases and/or counts where the underlying charge has been adjudicated and the remaining charge(s) are for failure to pay fine and/or failure to appear - Vehicle Code Section 40508 (a) and/or Vehicle Code Section 40508 (b) - amended by striking the word misdemeanor and inserting the word infraction; the motion memorializes an oral motion previously made on or about February 1, 1991 and remains in effect until withdrawn in writing.
California > Third Appellate District > Siskiyou County > Superior Court of California, County of Siskiyou
PETER F. KNOLL, District Attorney County of Siskiyou P. O. Box 986 Yreka, CA 96097 (916) 842-8125 IN THE JUSTICE COURT OF THE WESTERN JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF SISKIYOU, STATE OF CALIFORNIA YREKA DIVISION THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA Plaintiff, ANY NAMED DEFENDANT, Defendant. No. STANDING MOTION TO AMEND MISDEMEANOR 40508 V.C. TO INFRACTION. The People of the State of California by their representative the District Attorney of Siskiyou County hereby move to amend all cases and/or counts where the underlying charge has been adjudicated and the remaining charge(s) are for failure to pay fine and/or failure to appear, to wit, Vehicle Code Section 40508 (a) and/or Vehicle Code Section 40508 (b), by striking the word misdemeanor and inserting the word infraction. This Motion memorializes an oral motion previously made on or about February 1, 1991. This Motion shall be considered a standing motion to amend and shall remain in effect until withdrawn in writing. Dated: January 12, 1993 PETER F. KNOLL DISTRICT ATTORNEY Laura E. Stanhope Deputy District Attorney IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: ROGER T. KOSEL JUDGE OF THE JUSTICE COURT
PETER F. KNOLL, District Attorney County of Siskiyou P. O. Box 986 Yreka, CA 96097 (916) 842-8125 IN THE JUSTICE COURT OF THE WESTERN JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF SISKIYOU, STATE OF CALIFORNIA YREKA DIVISION THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA Plaintiff, ANY NAMED DEFENDANT, Defendant. No. STANDING MOTION TO AMEND MISDEMEANOR 40508 V.C. TO INFRACTION. The People of the State of California by thei
Reviewer note: Transcribed 2026-10-12 (California T4 Siskiyou build 2026-10-12) by eye from BenchPath custody ca/t4/ca-siskiyou/docs/general/1993-1-14-standing-order-re-motion-amend-misdo-40508-vc-infraction.pdf (142886 bytes, sha256 ec9bb13a847ae16d206e7fae7603f87982bfd013f2b986489c418b607a865829; 2 pages; scanned page images with an invisible OCR text layer): read on the page images rendered at 200 dpi; checked against RapidOCR on the pages and the file's own scanner OCR layer, never published: every 6-word window looked up, and of the 6 spans no reading holds, 3 split into pieces a reading holds (the caption and title lines the readings interleave with the filing stamp, and the page break) and 3 read again on the page image (the letterhead's two middle lines, the caption (“ANY NAMED DEFENDANT”) and the judge's signature block) (vision/check-log.txt). Not part of the text: the pleading line numbers, the caption's column of parentheses and the pleading paper's printed foot; the clerk's filing stamp; the motion's number in the caption's “No.” field and the order's date, both written by hand; the signatures; a speck on the baseline before the title's “40508” (not a character). The transcription's closing note, which describes the pages, is not published. Review note: The motion was made and granted in the Justice Court of the Western Judicial District, Yreka Division, a court of the county before the trial courts’ unification; the court’s Order re Standing Orders of June 24, 2025 lists it, as of 1993-1-14, among the standing orders that remain in effect, and the Local Rules & Standing Orders page dates it January 14, 1993 (the order’s own date is written by hand).
Standing order of the 109th Judicial District Court for every pending or later-filed case in Andrews, Winkler and Crane Counties: any attorney or self-represented litigant who uses any form of artificial intelligence for legal research or drafting in a case must, before using AI-generated information in a court submission or proceeding, sign and submit the court's certification form stating that all language, quotations, sources, citations, arguments and legal analysis created or contributed to by generative AI were verified as accurate by a human through traditional (non-AI) legal sources, and acknowledging responsibility and potential sanctions for their or their co-counsel's failure to comply. Effective immediately; in effect until rescinded or replaced.
Standing order of the 109th Judicial District Court for every pending or later-filed case in Andrews, Winkler and Crane Counties: any attorney or self-represented litigant who uses any form of artificial intelligence for legal research or drafting in a case must, before using AI-generated information in a court submission or proceeding, sign and submit the court's certification form stating that all language, quotations, sources, citations, arguments and legal analysis created or contributed to by generative AI were verified as accurate by a human through traditional (non-AI) legal sources, and acknowledging responsibility and potential sanctions for their or their co-counsel's failure to comply. Effective immediately; in effect until rescinded or replaced.