Loading…
A standing order of Karen L. Dixon, Presiding Judge, dated September 14, 2022: the use of the courthouse facilities for client interviewing, meeting, and/or discussions with incarcerated parties without the express consent of the judicial officer presiding over the calendar is prohibited; except for last day arraignments, any request to use a courthouse interview room is made orally in open court, the presiding judicial officer considering the efficient flow of the court calendar, the safety needs of correctional officers and incarcerated persons, and whether the matter would be better trailed for counsel to meet the client at the jail; the correctional staff do not allow access to courthouse interview rooms without court approval (the jail has no less than two attorney/client interview rooms and remote means).
California > Third Appellate District > Siskiyou County > Superior Court of California, County of Siskiyou
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SISKIYOU 411 Fourth Street Yreka, California 96097 Dated: September 14, 2022 Hon. Karen L. Dixon, Presiding Judge STANDING ORDER RE: ATTORNEY INTERVIEW ROOMS IN COURT HOLDING Whereas it is the intention of the court to facilitate speedy access to justice and the resolution of cases, and whereas this intention is not realized if the flow of the court’s calendars is interrupted due to the failure of counsel to meet with their incarcerated clients prior to court appearances; and Whereas the courthouse interview facilities are limited and were not intended for purposes of extended attorney client meetings and discussions immediately prior to court appearances; and Whereas the extended use of the courthouse interview facilities for such purposes immediately prior to court appearances negatively impacts the ability of the correctional staff to move incarcerated persons safely and efficiently through the courthouse as necessary for the court’s needs; and Whereas such extended use of the courthouse interview facilities further negatively impacts the jail and correctional officers by increasing the need for additional correctional officers to be called upon to facilitate the safe and efficient movement of incarcerated persons within the courthouse, thereby decreasing the presence of correctional officers at the correctional facility, and increasing the risks to correctional staff and inmates at the correctional facility; and Whereas the jail has no less than two sanitized attorney/client interview rooms in addition to the means for attorneys to safely and privately meet with their clients remotely by both electronic and telephonic means; It is ordered that the use of the courthouse facilities for client interviewing, meeting, and/or discussions with incarcerated parties without the express consent of the judicial officer presiding over the subject calendar is prohibited. Except for last day arraignments, any requests made for such use of a courthouse interview room shall be made orally in open court. The presiding judicial officer has discretion to allow the use of the courthouse interview room after having considered the need for the efficient flow of the court calendar, the safety needs of correctional officers and incarcerated persons, and whether the matter would be better trailed to later in the calendar day or some other time to allow counsel to meet with his/her client at the jail. The correctional staff shall not allow access to courthouse interview rooms without court approval. Dated: September 14, 2022 Presiding Judge
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SISKIYOU 411 Fourth Street Yreka, California 96097 Dated: September 14, 2022 Hon. Karen L. Dixon, Presiding Judge STANDING ORDER RE: ATTORNEY INTERVIEW ROOMS IN COURT HOLDING Whereas it is the intention of the court to facilitate speedy access to justice and the resolution of cases, and whereas this intention is not realized if the flow of the court’s calenda
Reviewer note: Transcribed 2026-10-12 (California T4 Siskiyou build 2026-10-12) by eye from BenchPath custody ca/t4/ca-siskiyou/docs/general/standing-order-re-atty-interview-rooms-court-holding.pdf (351858 bytes, sha256 a8e76eb62569fd13ef6509f25df06328984a4234a9b45109273dd05fbc2263d3; 1 page; scanned page images with an invisible OCR text layer): read on the page image rendered at 200 dpi; checked against RapidOCR on the page and the file's own scanner OCR layer, never published: every 6-word window of the transcription is found in a reading (vision/check-log.txt). Not part of the text: the letterhead's drawing, the signature over “Presiding Judge” and the distribution list below it. The transcription's closing note, which describes the pages, is not published.
Standing order of the 109th Judicial District Court for every pending or later-filed case in Andrews, Winkler and Crane Counties: any attorney or self-represented litigant who uses any form of artificial intelligence for legal research or drafting in a case must, before using AI-generated information in a court submission or proceeding, sign and submit the court's certification form stating that all language, quotations, sources, citations, arguments and legal analysis created or contributed to by generative AI were verified as accurate by a human through traditional (non-AI) legal sources, and acknowledging responsibility and potential sanctions for their or their co-counsel's failure to comply. Effective immediately; in effect until rescinded or replaced.
Standing order of the 109th Judicial District Court for every pending or later-filed case in Andrews, Winkler and Crane Counties: any attorney or self-represented litigant who uses any form of artificial intelligence for legal research or drafting in a case must, before using AI-generated information in a court submission or proceeding, sign and submit the court's certification form stating that all language, quotations, sources, citations, arguments and legal analysis created or contributed to by generative AI were verified as accurate by a human through traditional (non-AI) legal sources, and acknowledging responsibility and potential sanctions for their or their co-counsel's failure to comply. Effective immediately; in effect until rescinded or replaced.