Loading…
A standing order of the Justice Court of the Western Judicial District, Yreka Division, on the District Attorney’s standing motion of January 12, 1993, granted by Roger T. Kosel, Judge of the Justice Court: the alternative count of Vehicle Code section 23152 subsection (a) and/or subsection (b), when both are alleged, dismissed upon the finding of guilt by the court as to either count; the motion memorializes an oral motion previously made on or about February 1, 1991 and remains in effect until withdrawn in writing.
California > Third Appellate District > Siskiyou County > Superior Court of California, County of Siskiyou
PETER F. KNOLL, District Attorney County of Siskiyou P. O. Box 986 Yreka, CA 96097 (916) 842-8125 IN THE JUSTICE COURT OF THE WESTERN JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF SISKIYOU, STATE OF CALIFORNIA YREKA DIVISION THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA Plaintiff, ANY NAMED DEFENDANTS, Defendant. No. STANDING ORDER TO DISMISS ALTERNATE COUNTS (VC 231252) The People of the State of California by their representative the District Attorney of Siskiyou County, hereby move to dismiss the alternative count of Vehicle Code section 23152 subsection (a) and/or Vehicle Code section subsection (b), when both are alleged, upon the finding of guilt by the court as to either count. This Motion memorializes an oral motion previously made on or about February 1, 1991. This Motion shall be considered a standing motion to amend and shall remain in effect until withdrawn in writing. Dated: January 12, 1993 PETER F. KNOLL DISTRICT ATTORNEY Laura E. Stanhope Deputy District Attorney IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: ROGER T. KOSEL JUDGE OF THE JUSTICE COURT
PETER F. KNOLL, District Attorney County of Siskiyou P. O. Box 986 Yreka, CA 96097 (916) 842-8125 IN THE JUSTICE COURT OF THE WESTERN JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF SISKIYOU, STATE OF CALIFORNIA YREKA DIVISION THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA Plaintiff, ANY NAMED DEFENDANTS, Defendant. No. STANDING ORDER TO DISMISS ALTERNATE COUNTS (VC 231252) The People of the State of California by their repre
Reviewer note: Transcribed 2026-10-12 (California T4 Siskiyou build 2026-10-12) by eye from BenchPath custody ca/t4/ca-siskiyou/docs/general/1993-1-14-standing-order-re-dismiss-alternate-counts-23152-vc.pdf (124625 bytes, sha256 b973f221876182861459e998f013e01ffd62d0b36963dd55b4ba51de197f093e; 2 pages; scanned page images with an invisible OCR text layer): read on the page images rendered at 200 dpi; checked against RapidOCR on the pages and the file's own scanner OCR layer, never published: every 6-word window looked up, and of the 6 spans no reading holds, 4 split into pieces a reading holds (the letterhead and caption lines the readings interleave with the filing stamp, and the page break) and 2 read again on the page image (the two signature blocks the signatures cross) (vision/check-log.txt). Not part of the text: the pleading line numbers, the closing “///” lines of page 1, the caption's column of parentheses and the pleading paper's printed foot; the clerk's filing stamp; the order's number in the caption's “No.” field and the order's date, both written by hand; the signatures. Carried as printed: the title's citation “(VC 231252)”, “Vehicle Code section subsection (b)” and “a standing motion to amend”. The transcription's closing note, which describes the pages, is not published. Review note: The order was made in the Justice Court of the Western Judicial District, Yreka Division, a court of the county before the trial courts’ unification; the court’s Order re Standing Orders of June 24, 2025 lists it, as of 1993-1-14, among the standing orders that remain in effect, and the Local Rules & Standing Orders page dates it January 14, 1993 (the order’s own date is written by hand). As printed: the title’s citation “(VC 231252)” (the motion cites Vehicle Code section 23152), “Vehicle Code section subsection (b)” without the section’s number, and “This Motion shall be considered a standing motion to amend” (the motion is to dismiss) (a review task).
Standing order of the 109th Judicial District Court for every pending or later-filed case in Andrews, Winkler and Crane Counties: any attorney or self-represented litigant who uses any form of artificial intelligence for legal research or drafting in a case must, before using AI-generated information in a court submission or proceeding, sign and submit the court's certification form stating that all language, quotations, sources, citations, arguments and legal analysis created or contributed to by generative AI were verified as accurate by a human through traditional (non-AI) legal sources, and acknowledging responsibility and potential sanctions for their or their co-counsel's failure to comply. Effective immediately; in effect until rescinded or replaced.
Standing order of the 109th Judicial District Court for every pending or later-filed case in Andrews, Winkler and Crane Counties: any attorney or self-represented litigant who uses any form of artificial intelligence for legal research or drafting in a case must, before using AI-generated information in a court submission or proceeding, sign and submit the court's certification form stating that all language, quotations, sources, citations, arguments and legal analysis created or contributed to by generative AI were verified as accurate by a human through traditional (non-AI) legal sources, and acknowledging responsibility and potential sanctions for their or their co-counsel's failure to comply. Effective immediately; in effect until rescinded or replaced.