Fee waiver applications for matters being appealed to the Court of Appeal - the procedure generally, at the superior court and at the Court of Appeal (13.1).
California > First Appellate District > Solano County > Superior Court of California, County of Solano
Rule 13 – Appeals 13.1 FEE WAIVER APPLICATIONS FOR MATTERS BEING APPEALED TO THE COURT OF APPEAL a. FEE WAIVER REQUEST PROCEDURE GENERALLY Where a party appealing a matter seeks a waiver of court fees and costs from the Superior Court of California, County of Solano as well as from the First District Court of Appeal and a fee waiver request has not been filed directly with the First District Court of Appeal, the party shall submit two separate Request to Waive Court Fees forms (Judicial Council form FW-001) to the Clerk of the Superior Court. One form shall be directed to the superior court and the other form shall be directed to the First District Court of Appeal. (Subd (a) adopted effective January 1, 2010.) b. PROCEDURE FOR WAIVING FEES AT THE SUPERIOR COURT The request to waive fees on appeal at the superior court level shall be processed and determined per Government Code section 68630 et seq. (Subd (b) adopted effective January 1, 2010.) c. PROCEDURE FOR WAIVING FEES AT THE COURT OF APPEAL The superior court shall receive and transmit to the First District Court of Appeal for filing, processing and determination any fee waiver which seeks to waive fees charged by the First District Court of Appeal. The superior court’s acceptance of the FW-001 form on behalf of the Court of Appeal shall not be deemed a “filing” for purposes of Government Code section 68634.5, subdivision (f). (Subd (c) adopted effective January 1, 2010.) (Rule 13.1 adopted effective January 1, 2010.)
Rule 13 – Appeals 13.1 FEE WAIVER APPLICATIONS FOR MATTERS BEING APPEALED TO THE COURT OF APPEAL a. FEE WAIVER REQUEST PROCEDURE GENERALLY Where a party appealing a matter seeks a waiver of court fees and costs from the Superior Court of California, County of Solano as well as from the First District Court of Appeal and a fee waiver request has not been filed directly with the First District Court
Reviewer note: Composed 2026-10-09 (California T4 Solano build 2026-10-09) from BenchPath custody ca/t4/ca-solano/docs/general/complete_set_of_local_rules_july_2026.pdf (the court's rule book, “Local Court Rules”, revised July 1, 2026, as fetched 2026-10-09; 7347859 bytes, sha256 f235df4f2c4c47b9c4e290445ffa2be1b5ad4302da615570c85a49e5138357e7; 350 pages) with the shared verbatim composer (v2 reflow) over Rules 1 to 20 (their pages between PDF pages 15 and 323), each rule composed alone from its first page to its last, in segments that start where a part's or an appendix's heading first prints: each page's running header (“Superior Court of California” and “County of Solano”, then the rule's title and the current part or appendix, kept where each first prints) and footer (the page number, the court's website address and “July 2026”) removed as chrome; lines reflowed into the rules' paragraphs; 44 whitespace-only fixes (build/book-fixes.json: thirteen breaks the reflow made before a wrapped “Rule N.N” citation rejoined, two form numbers broken after their hyphen rejoined, and twenty-nine heading, history note, paragraph, list, table row and address breaks it ran together set back; the short-line and vertical-gap audits find no joined break left); the scanned appendices (the standing orders printed in the appendices of Rules 5, 6 and 17, and the weapons order printed again after the forms index) left out and decided as documents - the strike report's 14 struck runs all lie on those scanned pages; proof 1 (whitespace-only) and proof 2 (same character multiset as the text layer minus chrome) pass. The cover, the revision history, the table of contents, the dividers and the indexes belong to no rule.
Division XI: information forms for data processing (Rule 11.2); required action - action taken on all calendared cases and a future date always set (Rule 11.19); and pro tem judges - an attorney named as a plaintiff in a civil or small claims case may not sit as a judge pro-tem during the case or within six months following its resolution, nor one named as a defendant in two or more such cases (Rule 11.22). Rules 11.1, 11.3 to 11.5, 11.7 to 11.18, 11.20 and 11.21 are repealed, and Rule 11.6 (voluntary arbitration; see Local Rule 10.2) was repealed and renumbered.
Duval County's indigent-defense and magistration rules under the Texas Fair Defense Act (S.B. 7): who may be booked into the county jail and on what paper; arrest-case numbering; presentment to a magistrate within 48 hours (art. 15.16); the magistrate's warnings, counsel inquiry, interpreter duty, indigence determination and appointment of counsel within 24 hours of a request; the alternative appointment plan under art. 26.04(g)-(h) with annual applications, seven attorney categories (capital, first and second degree, third degree/state jail/misdemeanor, competency, appeals, post-conviction, extradition), CLE and experience standards, random rotation within each category, written acceptance within 48 hours, first contact by the end of the next working day, replacement and suspension of counsel, fee applications within five days of completing services and the compensation attachment ($500 pleas; $175/$150 hourly; $1,400 per jury-trial day; appellate caps); bail schedules by offense class with a personal bond office (fee $20 or 3%), pre-trial supervision and revocation hearings within two working days; arraignment settings and notice; repeal of conflicting rules.