Loading…
The protective order issued under Standing Order 2016-001-JV (printed in the appendix to Local Rule 6): no document or information from a juvenile case file may be disseminated by the receiving party, attached to another document or used in another proceeding without the prior approval of the Presiding Judge of the Juvenile Court, except as listed (use in a proceeding to declare the minor a dependent child or ward; release to office staff, clients, expert witnesses and investigators for the pending matter; discovery obligations of prosecutors and defense counsel; disclosure to a judicial officer of Solano County Superior Court; cooperation with federal authorities); every production under the standing order accompanied by a copy of the order; all copies destroyed at the conclusion of the proceedings except a single sealed copy in each counsel's file; and any violation punishable as a misdemeanor.
California > First Appellate District > Solano County > Superior Court of California, County of Solano
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF SOLANO IN SESSION AS A JUVENILE COURT IN THE MATTER OF: RELEASE OF JUVENILE RECORDS PROTECTIVE ORDER RE: RELEASE OF JUVENILE CASE FILE INFORMATION FOR W&I 601 AND 602 PROCEEDINGS Pursuant to the terms of Standing Order 2016-001-JV, unless otherwise specifically authorized by the Juvenile Court, or otherwise provided by this Order, every person who received documents or information relating to the contents of records from a juvenile case file is subject to the following protective order: A. No documents from a juvenile case file or information relating to the contents of records in a juvenile case file may be disseminated by the receiving party to any other person or agency, or made attachments to any other document(s) or used in any other proceeding without the prior approval of the Presiding Judge of the Juvenile Court, except as follows: 1. The records are used in a proceeding to declare the minor who is the subject of the records, a dependent child or ward of the juvenile court. 2. The records are released to immediate office staff, clients, expert witnesses and investigators retained for the purposes of the pending matter only and with no one else. 3. District Attorneys, City Attorneys authorized to prosecute criminal cases, and Public Defenders or other private defense counsel may disseminate records or disclose information in compliance with their discovery obligations under statutory and case law. 4. Records and information may be disclosed to a judicial officer of Solano County Superior Court for any purpose associated with that judicial officer’s obligation to render any type of decision concerning that individual. 5. In cooperation with federal authorities or entities as permitted or required by state or federal law. B. Any production or dissemination of records pursuant to Standing Order 2016-001-JV shall be accompanied by a copy of this Protective Order. C. At the conclusion of the proceedings for which the records were disseminated, the receiving party shall cause all copies of the documents released to be destroyed, except that a single copy of the documents may be retained in each counsel’s file, in a sealed condition, and no person shall have access to the documents thereafter without further order from the Juvenile Court. D. Any violation of this Protective Order is punishable as a misdemeanor. DATED: 5/16/24 DORA M. RIOS PRESIDING JUDGE OF THE SUPERIOR COURT JUVENILE DIVISION
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF SOLANO IN SESSION AS A JUVENILE COURT IN THE MATTER OF: RELEASE OF JUVENILE RECORDS PROTECTIVE ORDER RE: RELEASE OF JUVENILE CASE FILE INFORMATION FOR W&I 601 AND 602 PROCEEDINGS Pursuant to the terms of Standing Order 2016-001-JV, unless otherwise specifically authorized by the Juvenile Court, or otherwise provided by this Order, every
Reviewer note: Transcribed 2026-10-09 (California T4 Solano build 2026-10-09) by eye from PDF pages 173 to 174 of BenchPath custody ca/t4/ca-solano/docs/general/complete_set_of_local_rules_july_2026.pdf (the court's rule book, 7347859 bytes, sha256 f235df4f2c4c47b9c4e290445ffa2be1b5ad4302da615570c85a49e5138357e7; the order is printed as a scan in the appendix to Local Rule 6; the pages are scans whose text Acrobat's OCR redraws as visible text in synthesized fonts - an OCR reading, never quoted): read on the page images rendered at 200 dpi; checked against two machine readings never published (RapidOCR on each page and the file's own text layer where it has one): every 6-word window of the transcription looked up, and the 3 spans the readings do not hold - at the caption's cells, handwriting, page breaks, footnotes and section signs, where the readings run the parts in another order or misread them - read again on the page images (evidence/vision-check-2026-10-09-resolved.txt). The clerk's filed stamp, the signatures and seals and the pleading paper's line numbers are not part of the text (a handwritten date or line is carried where it fills the order's own text); the transcription's closing note, which describes them, is not published.
Standing order of the 109th Judicial District Court for every pending or later-filed case in Andrews, Winkler and Crane Counties: any attorney or self-represented litigant who uses any form of artificial intelligence for legal research or drafting in a case must, before using AI-generated information in a court submission or proceeding, sign and submit the court's certification form stating that all language, quotations, sources, citations, arguments and legal analysis created or contributed to by generative AI were verified as accurate by a human through traditional (non-AI) legal sources, and acknowledging responsibility and potential sanctions for their or their co-counsel's failure to comply. Effective immediately; in effect until rescinded or replaced.
Standing order of the 109th Judicial District Court for every pending or later-filed case in Andrews, Winkler and Crane Counties: any attorney or self-represented litigant who uses any form of artificial intelligence for legal research or drafting in a case must, before using AI-generated information in a court submission or proceeding, sign and submit the court's certification form stating that all language, quotations, sources, citations, arguments and legal analysis created or contributed to by generative AI were verified as accurate by a human through traditional (non-AI) legal sources, and acknowledging responsibility and potential sanctions for their or their co-counsel's failure to comply. Effective immediately; in effect until rescinded or replaced.