Loading…
A standing order of the court, signed by Debra L. Givens, Judge of the Superior Court, and dated and filed August 17, 2017, effective immediately: an official court reporter or official reporter pro tempore takes down all argument on all civil law and motion matters, and a fee of $30 is charged from the moving party - enacted to comply with the intent of Government Code section 68086(a)(1) and Code of Civil Procedure section 269(a)(1).
California > Third Appellate District > Yuba County > Superior Court of California, County of Yuba
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF YUBA In the Matter of: STANDING ORDER OF THE COURT. COURT GENERAL ORDER FOR COURT REPORTERS IN CIVIL LAW AND MOTION IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, effective immediately, an official court reporter or official reporter pro tempore shall take down all argument on all civil law and motion matters. A fee of $30 shall be charged from the moving party. This order is enacted to comply with the intent of Government Code section 68086(a)(1), and Code of Civil Procedure section 269(a)(1). DATED: August 17, 2017 DEBRA L. GIVENS JUDGE OF THE SUPERIOR COURT
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF YUBA In the Matter of: STANDING ORDER OF THE COURT. COURT GENERAL ORDER FOR COURT REPORTERS IN CIVIL LAW AND MOTION IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, effective immediately, an official court reporter or official reporter pro tempore shall take down all argument on all civil law and motion matters. A fee of $30 shall be charged from the moving party. This order is enacte
Reviewer note: Transcribed 2026-10-11 (California T4 Yuba build 2026-10-11) by eye from BenchPath custody ca/t4/ca-yuba/docs/2017-08-17-court-reporter-order.pdf (12749 bytes, sha256 44105fce0cd997cb7145a253302efea73364a76c66c290ed53710b36362f763b; 1 page; page images, no text layer): read on the page image rendered at 200 dpi (its body read again at 300 dpi; the file has no text layer); checked against RapidOCR on the page, never published: every 6-word window of the transcription looked up, and the 2 spans the reading does not hold are the caption's columns, which the reading sets line by line, and the break before the order's first words (vision/check-log.txt). The judge's handwritten signature and the clerk's filing stamp are not part of the text; the pleading line numbers and the running footer are not carried; the day “17” written by hand on the date line is set as text; the transcription's closing note, which describes the page, is not published. Review note: Rule 2.8(A), carded in Chapter 2 (amended 1/01/20, renumbered 1/1/24), says the court “does not routinely provide court reporters, except in proceedings involving LPS conservatorships, felony criminal and juvenile dependency and wardship”, while this order of August 17, 2017 has an official reporter take down all argument on all civil law and motion matters; the court's Civil Division page (carded) still states the $30 fee for “each matter set for the 10:00 a.m. Monday* civil law and motion calendar” - whether the order remains in force (a review task).
Standing order of the 109th Judicial District Court for every pending or later-filed case in Andrews, Winkler and Crane Counties: any attorney or self-represented litigant who uses any form of artificial intelligence for legal research or drafting in a case must, before using AI-generated information in a court submission or proceeding, sign and submit the court's certification form stating that all language, quotations, sources, citations, arguments and legal analysis created or contributed to by generative AI were verified as accurate by a human through traditional (non-AI) legal sources, and acknowledging responsibility and potential sanctions for their or their co-counsel's failure to comply. Effective immediately; in effect until rescinded or replaced.
Standing order of the 109th Judicial District Court for every pending or later-filed case in Andrews, Winkler and Crane Counties: any attorney or self-represented litigant who uses any form of artificial intelligence for legal research or drafting in a case must, before using AI-generated information in a court submission or proceeding, sign and submit the court's certification form stating that all language, quotations, sources, citations, arguments and legal analysis created or contributed to by generative AI were verified as accurate by a human through traditional (non-AI) legal sources, and acknowledging responsibility and potential sanctions for their or their co-counsel's failure to comply. Effective immediately; in effect until rescinded or replaced.