Loading…
1 verbatim mandatory provision from ECFLAD 2006-03 ATTORNEY GUARDIAN AD LITEM PROGRAM.
First Judicial Circuit. Check the order's own effective and rescission dates before relying on it. Procedural information only; not legal advice.
• An identical order for each division shall be used by the Family Law Judges for Divisions L, M, and P, as circumstances warrant.
An identical order for each division shall be used by the Family Law Judges for Divisions L, M, and P, as circumstances warrant.
Reviewer note: Document sha256: 4f9a0b63b604324ae47aed3d012622283a90b789aeae2d9174fa6cd1b1f2d0b8 (51128 bytes). BenchPath harvested this circuit itself because no research corpus existed for it. Extraction is conservative: mandatory-language sentences only, so this rule is a faithful subset of the order, never a summary of it. | Set to in_review 2026-07-26: the order's subject looks practitioner-facing but the extracted text captured only recitals or an effective date, not the operative ORDERED section. This is an extraction defect, not a judgement that the order is unimportant — it needs re-extraction before it goes back on the published surface. | Re-extracted 2026-07-26 from the numbered paragraphs following the order's ORDERED clause, replacing a first pass that had captured recitals and the effective date. Verbatim from the operative section of this order, re-extracted 2026-07-26; whitespace normalised only. [moved from the text 2026-09-14]
9 verbatim requirements from 4th Circuit Administrative Order 1997-10.
6 verbatim requirements from 4th Circuit Administrative Order 1997-13.