Loading…
1 verbatim mandatory provision from SRCAD 2013-04 Pretrial Release and County Probation Programs.
First Judicial Circuit. Check the order's own effective and rescission dates before relying on it. Procedural information only; not legal advice.
Verbatim from the order's own text layer, harvested 2026-07-24; whitespace normalised only. No OCR was used. Only sentences containing mandatory language (shall, must, may not, no later than, within N) are reproduced — the full document is in custody and is the controlling text. • PRETRIAL RELEASE AND COUNTY PROBATION PROGRAMS – SANTA ROSA COUNTY WHEREAS, Santa Rosa County Administrative Directive 2011-01 addressed procedural modifications to better implement the Pretrial Release and County Probation Programs in Santa Rosa County, and WHEREAS, Defendants ordered into the Pretrial Release Program in Santa Rosa County, Florida or placed on County Probation in said county, may have a special condition of GPS Monitoring, and WHEREAS, those Defendants with a special condition of GPS Monitoring are supervised by the Pretrial Release Program in Santa Rosa County or the Santa Rosa County Probation Program, and the GPS Monitoring is conducted by the Sheriff of Santa Rosa County, Florida, and WHEREAS, it has been identified additional clarification is required, it is ORDERED that:
PRETRIAL RELEASE AND COUNTY PROBATION PROGRAMS – SANTA ROSA COUNTY WHEREAS, Santa Rosa County Administrative Directive 2011-01 addressed procedural modifications to better implement the Pretrial Release and County Probation Programs in Santa Rosa County, and WHEREAS, Defendants ordered into the Pretrial Release Program in Santa Rosa County, Florida or placed on County Probation in said county, may have a special condition of GPS Monitoring, and WHEREAS, those Defendants with a special condition of GPS Monitoring are supervised by the Pretrial Release Program in Santa Rosa County or the Santa Rosa County Probation Program, and the GPS Monitoring is conducted by the Sheriff of Santa Rosa County, Florida, and WHEREAS, it has been identified additional clarification is required, it is ORDERED that:
Reviewer note: Document sha256: 51ef820516b208c77517aaa7d8382d34e826335ec5cfad19fd8e4351043a9a71 (48342 bytes). BenchPath harvested this circuit itself because no research corpus existed for it. Extraction is conservative: mandatory-language sentences only, so this rule is a faithful subset of the order, never a summary of it.
The 17th Circuit's circuit-wide AI disclosure/certification mandate (Jan 2026, twice amended) was VACATED in its entirety effective June 15, 2026 by Chief Judge Phillips's AO 2026-19-Gen, expressly citing the statewide framework (AOSC26-12; Rule 2.515(d)(2), SC2026-0673). Several division procedure pages still cite the vacated order.
Every circuit-civil case reviewed within 120 days of commencement and assigned a track (complex, streamlined, or general); case management orders required; firm continuance policy; sanctions for missed deadlines. Rescinds AO 21-09.
Circuit-civil hearing-availability standards: motion calendars ~2 weeks from request; 15-30 min special sets within 45-60 days; longer special sets scale.