Loading…
9 verbatim mandatory provisions from SRCAD 2023-02 Procedures for Recusals and Disqualifications, Amends SRCAD 2021-01.
First Judicial Circuit. Check the order's own effective and rescission dates before relying on it. Procedural information only; not legal advice.
• Warrick now presides over Division D (Dependency/Delinquency/Probate/Guardianship), and WHEREAS, Judge Warrick may have known conflicts arising from his previous representation as an attorney, which would require him to recuse/disqualify from a case, it is therefore, ORDERED, effective immediately, the Clerk of Court shall utilize the following procedures when reassigning Division D cases due to a recusal or disqualification, within Santa Rosa County: • Division D Dependency Cases – Any Dependency case wherein the Division D judge disqualifies/recuses, the case shall be reassigned to Circuit Judge J. • Should Judge Duncan disqualify/recuse, the case shall be randomly reassigned among the remaining circuit judges. • If all circuit judges disqualify/recuse, the case shall be randomly reassigned among the county judges. • Division D Delinquency – Any Delinquency case wherein the Division D judge disqualifies/recuses, the case shall be reassigned to Circuit Judge Clifton Drake. • Should Judge Drake disqualify/recuse, the case shall be randomly reassigned among the remaining circuit judges. • Division D (Probate/Guardianship) – Any Probate/Guardianship case wherein the Division D judge disqualifies/recuses, the case shall be reassigned to Circuit Judge Darlene F. • Should Judge Dickey disqualify/recuse, the case shall be randomly reassigned among the remaining circuit judges. • Upon disqualification/recusal of all judges in Santa Rosa County, and, when randomly reassigning cases received from another county, the Clerk of Court shall follow the procedures as outlined in Administrative Order 2012-58. SRCAD 2023-02, Procedures for Recusals and Disqualifications This administrative directive amending SRCAD 2021-01 shall remain in effect until further order of the Court.
Warrick now presides over Division D (Dependency/Delinquency/Probate/Guardianship), and WHEREAS, Judge Warrick may have known conflicts arising from his previous representation as an attorney, which would require him to recuse/disqualify from a case, it is therefore, ORDERED, effective immediately, the Clerk of Court shall utilize the following procedures when reassigning Division D cases due to a recusal or disqualification, within Santa Rosa County:
Reviewer note: Document sha256: e59723945dead0975515418370b738ce448ea1f2eb7096639145b8e0f0a2c312 (19989 bytes). BenchPath harvested this circuit itself because no research corpus existed for it. Extraction is conservative: mandatory-language sentences only, so this rule is a faithful subset of the order, never a summary of it. Text layer cleaned 2026-09-08 (Phase 3a): page markers removed; wording untouched. Slug completed 2026-09-09 (fix program 2026-09-09, Phase 5, audit M7): was fl1-live-srcad-2023-02-procedures-for-recusals-and-disqualifications- (truncated with a trailing hyphen). Verbatim from the order's own text layer, harvested 2026-07-24; whitespace normalised only. No OCR was used. Only sentences containing mandatory language (shall, must, may not, no later than, within N) are reproduced — the full document is in custody and is the controlling text. [moved from the text 2026-09-14] [Re-filed 2026-09-26: the harvest lane's topic map matched 'mediat' inside 'immediately', so this order was filed under Mediation; with the pattern anchored to whole words the lane's own map files it under Administrative Orders. Text unchanged.]
9 verbatim requirements from 4th Circuit Administrative Order 1997-10.
6 verbatim requirements from 4th Circuit Administrative Order 1997-13.