Broward Division 08 (CARLOS AUGUSTO RODRIGUEZ) — Proposed orders

Source of truth

1. After the Court has ruled on a Motion at a hearing, the parties shall submit a proposed order to the CMS workbench consistent with the Court’s ruling as soon as possible and no later than 3 business days following the hearing. If the parties cannot agree on a proposed order, the parties shall notify the Court of competing orders via email or shall immediately set the matter for a UMC hearing to resolve any discrepancy. No party shall upload an Order on the Court’s workbench unless the Order is agreed or the Court has directed the party to do so. The Court will not consider competing orders on CMS.

Official source

17th Circuit — Court site corpus (AO archive, local rules, judiciary)

Source health

Healthy · checked October 24, 2026

Effective date

—

Last verified

September 9, 2026benchpath-reverify-2026-09-08 (live text containment) | prior: benchpath-completeness-2026-07-24

Reviewer note: Document sha256: 4770a32231c3e49b07add5ff0bfdda27085a2c60950f3599fa455267caa553b2. Corpus topic: PROPOSED_ORDERS. Published during the completeness pass — the audit found 2,753 verbatim requirements against 123 published rules. GOOGLE DOCS VEIN: 102 of the Seventeenth Circuit's 106 division procedure documents are published as Google Docs (docs.google.com/document/d/e/2PACX-...), not as PDFs on the court's own host. Two consecutive fetches of the same Google Doc URL return DIFFERENT bytes — Google injects per-request session config — so the document_sha256 recorded here pins one render, not a stable identity, and content-hash change detection does not work on this vein. Re-verified live 2026-07-24 by text presence instead: six sampled documents still carried 100%, 100%, 100%, 91%, 100% and 100% of their published requirements. Verbatim from the published divisional procedures, captured 2026-07-24; whitespace normalised only. [moved from the text 2026-09-14]