Broward Division 18 (FABIENNE E. FAHNESTOCK) — Proposed orders

Source of truth

A hearing is not necessary for a ruling on a motion to exceed page limitations. A copy of the motion to exceed page limitations and a proposed order shall be emailed to the division email for the Court’s review, with notice to all parties. The motion shall contain a certificate of conferral pursuant to Rule 1.202. If the motion is opposed, the written opposition must be filed and delivered to the Court for review no later than five (5) calendar days after service of the motion. The Court will rule on the motion on the papers. Do not set the motion for a hearing.

Official source

17th Circuit — Court site corpus (AO archive, local rules, judiciary)

Source health

Healthy · checked October 24, 2026

Effective date

—

Last verified

September 9, 2026benchpath-reverify-2026-09-08 (live text containment) | prior: benchpath-completeness-2026-07-24

Reviewer note: Document sha256: e3478c7600837cb7c83d1bdc674e1c6e164b8e189672d25e27efe0bbf773397a. Corpus topic: PROPOSED_ORDERS. Published during the completeness pass — the audit found 2,753 verbatim requirements against 123 published rules. GOOGLE DOCS VEIN: 102 of the Seventeenth Circuit's 106 division procedure documents are published as Google Docs (docs.google.com/document/d/e/2PACX-...), not as PDFs on the court's own host. Two consecutive fetches of the same Google Doc URL return DIFFERENT bytes — Google injects per-request session config — so the document_sha256 recorded here pins one render, not a stable identity, and content-hash change detection does not work on this vein. Re-verified live 2026-07-24 by text presence instead: six sampled documents still carried 100%, 100%, 100%, 91%, 100% and 100% of their published requirements. Verbatim from the published divisional procedures, captured 2026-07-24; whitespace normalised only. [moved from the text 2026-09-14]