Broward Division JO/32/JJ (ALBERTO RIBAS, JR.) — Proposed orders

Source of truth

Before submitting an order to the court as “Agreed,” the office preparing the agreed order must provide an advance copy to the opposing side and confirm there is no objection to the form of the order prior to submitting it to the Judge. When submitting such an order, notification shall be given to the judge that the opposing side either agrees to the order and/ or has no objection/position to the relief being ordered. Such agreement can be indicated in both the title of the order and in the email submission to the Court’s Judicial Assistant with all parties copied in the email. When submitting such proposed orders, please include a copy of the motion/

Official source

17th Circuit — Court site corpus (AO archive, local rules, judiciary)

Source health

Healthy · checked October 24, 2026

Effective date

—

Last verified

September 9, 2026benchpath-reverify-2026-09-08 (live text containment) | prior: benchpath-completeness-2026-07-24

Reviewer note: Document sha256: 7a0036e8ce8767e1e5a7c2eb3728681d26f0529e682bf07a997ec877d8e37980. Corpus topic: PROPOSED_ORDERS. Published during the completeness pass — the audit found 2,753 verbatim requirements against 123 published rules. GOOGLE DOCS VEIN: 102 of the Seventeenth Circuit's 106 division procedure documents are published as Google Docs (docs.google.com/document/d/e/2PACX-...), not as PDFs on the court's own host. Two consecutive fetches of the same Google Doc URL return DIFFERENT bytes — Google injects per-request session config — so the document_sha256 recorded here pins one render, not a stable identity, and content-hash change detection does not work on this vein. Re-verified live 2026-07-24 by text presence instead: six sampled documents still carried 100%, 100%, 100%, 91%, 100% and 100% of their published requirements. Verbatim from the published divisional procedures, captured 2026-07-24; whitespace normalised only. [moved from the text 2026-09-14]