Loading…
1 verbatim mandatory provision from 13-26-s.
Eighteenth Judicial Circuit. Check the order's own effective and rescission dates before relying on it. Procedural information only; not legal advice.
• DeKleva should not hear cases in which any attorney from the Law Firm of Matthews Ryan Bark, P.A. appears, it is ORDERED that all pending and all newly filed cases in which any attorney from the Law Firm of Matthews Ryan Bark, P.A. appears as attorney of record shall be reassigned to the next judge in rotation pursuant to pending or existing administrative orders.
DeKleva should not hear cases in which any attorney from the Law Firm of Matthews Ryan Bark, P.A. appears, it is ORDERED that all pending and all newly filed cases in which any attorney from the Law Firm of Matthews Ryan Bark, P.A. appears as attorney of record shall be reassigned to the next judge in rotation pursuant to pending or existing administrative orders.
Reviewer note: Document sha256: 94d19b651dc45bd9191ba03d22a0f89b42899bfcb7213de2066c6c34d780e62d (106911 bytes). BenchPath harvested this circuit itself because no research corpus existed for it. Extraction is conservative: mandatory-language sentences only, so this rule is a faithful subset of the order, never a summary of it. Verbatim from the order's own text layer, harvested 2026-07-24; whitespace normalised only. No OCR was used. Only sentences containing mandatory language (shall, must, may not, no later than, within N) are reproduced — the full document is in custody and is the controlling text. [moved from the text 2026-09-14]
9 verbatim requirements from 4th Circuit Administrative Order 1997-10.
6 verbatim requirements from 4th Circuit Administrative Order 1997-13.