Loading…
7 verbatim mandatory provisions from 17-29-b.
Eighteenth Judicial Circuit. Check the order's own effective and rescission dates before relying on it. Procedural information only; not legal advice.
Verbatim from the operative section of this order, re-extracted 2026-07-26; whitespace normalised only. • The following matrix lists the specific technical violations that may be addressed through the Alternative Sanctions Program process for offenders who were sentenced in Brevard County, Florida. Each technical violation includes a list of sanctions determined and approved by the court for the probation officer to select from when reporting these technical violations, based on the individual offender’s circumstances at the time of the violation. ALTERNATIVE SANCTIONS PROGRAM VIOLATION/SANCTION MATRIX VIOLATION APPROVED LIST OF SANCTIONS Condition (1): Reported late; failed to report as instructed • Attend Good will job club class 5 Condition (11): Failure to submit to random testing as directed
The following matrix lists the specific technical violations that may be addressed through the Alternative Sanctions Program process for offenders who were sentenced in Brevard County, Florida. Each technical violation includes a list of sanctions determined and approved by the court for the probation officer to select from when reporting these technical violations, based on the individual offender’s circumstances at the time of the violation. ALTERNATIVE SANCTIONS PROGRAM VIOLATION/SANCTION MATRIX VIOLATION APPROVED LIST OF SANCTIONS Condition (1): Reported late; failed to report as instructed
Reviewer note: Document sha256: b1f7cb4e440165b0b072c7df879e74263507c21a94a6cc0e6a302f90c41aec57 (181973 bytes). BenchPath harvested this circuit itself because no research corpus existed for it. Extraction is conservative: mandatory-language sentences only, so this rule is a faithful subset of the order, never a summary of it. | Set to in_review 2026-07-26: the order's subject looks practitioner-facing but the extracted text captured only recitals or an effective date, not the operative ORDERED section. This is an extraction defect, not a judgement that the order is unimportant — it needs re-extraction before it goes back on the published surface. | Re-extracted 2026-07-26 from the numbered paragraphs following the order's ORDERED clause, replacing a first pass that had captured recitals and the effective date. 26 further paragraph(s) were left out because their OCR is too corrupt to quote. | Scope corrected 2026-08-03: the 18th numbers county-specific orders with -b (Brevard) and -s (Seminole); unsuffixed orders are circuit-wide. This rule was bulk-tagged to one county at harvest; the court's own numbering convention now controls.
2 verbatim requirements from 4th Circuit Administrative Order 1986-33A.
1 verbatim requirement from 4th Circuit Administrative Order 1987-09.