1 verbatim mandatory provision from 19-22-b.
Eighteenth Judicial Circuit. Check the order's own effective and rescission dates before relying on it. Procedural information only; not legal advice.
Verbatim from the order's own text layer, harvested 2026-07-24; whitespace normalised only. No OCR was used. Only sentences containing mandatory language (shall, must, may not, no later than, within N) are reproduced — the full document is in custody and is the controlling text. • Garagozlo ____________________________________________________________________________________ The court having determined that Judge Garagozlo should not hear cases in which attorney Jessica Silva, Bar#1011110 appears, it is ORDERED that all pending or newly filed cases in which Jessica Silva, Bar#1011110 appears as attorney of record for any party shall be reassigned to the next judge in rotation pursuant to pending or existing administrative orders.
Garagozlo ____________________________________________________________________________________ The court having determined that Judge Garagozlo should not hear cases in which attorney Jessica Silva, Bar#1011110 appears, it is ORDERED that all pending or newly filed cases in which Jessica Silva, Bar#1011110 appears as attorney of record for any party shall be reassigned to the next judge in rotation pursuant to pending or existing administrative orders.
Reviewer note: Document sha256: b1ef2ad412e14f666aafe40767def161cd19d552656c072df78b5d29d464325b (95230 bytes). BenchPath harvested this circuit itself because no research corpus existed for it. Extraction is conservative: mandatory-language sentences only, so this rule is a faithful subset of the order, never a summary of it. | Scope corrected 2026-08-03: the 18th numbers county-specific orders with -b (Brevard) and -s (Seminole); unsuffixed orders are circuit-wide. This rule was bulk-tagged to one county at harvest; the court's own numbering convention now controls.
2 verbatim requirements from 4th Circuit Administrative Order 1986-33A.
1 verbatim requirement from 4th Circuit Administrative Order 1987-09.