Loading…
1 verbatim mandatory provision from 21-21-b.
Eighteenth Judicial Circuit. Check the order's own effective and rescission dates before relying on it. Procedural information only; not legal advice.
Verbatim from the order's own text layer, harvested 2026-07-24; whitespace normalised only. No OCR was used. Only sentences containing mandatory language (shall, must, may not, no later than, within N) are reproduced — the full document is in custody and is the controlling text. • JUDGES - Caseload Assignment - Reassignment of Cases Assigned to Judge David Dugan ____________________________________________________________________________________ The court having determined that Judge David Dugan should not hear cases in which Security First Insurance Company appears as a party, it is ORDERED that all pending or newly filed cases in which Security First Insurance Company appears as party shall be reassigned to the next judge in rotation pursuant to pending or existing administrative orders.
JUDGES - Caseload Assignment - Reassignment of Cases Assigned to Judge David Dugan ____________________________________________________________________________________ The court having determined that Judge David Dugan should not hear cases in which Security First Insurance Company appears as a party, it is ORDERED that all pending or newly filed cases in which Security First Insurance Company appears as party shall be reassigned to the next judge in rotation pursuant to pending or existing administrative orders.
Reviewer note: Document sha256: adb7e92ac040e4189f9e4fe888a94e36e07b39fb4611cf5650dba48ed2b4d527 (92424 bytes). BenchPath harvested this circuit itself because no research corpus existed for it. Extraction is conservative: mandatory-language sentences only, so this rule is a faithful subset of the order, never a summary of it. | Scope corrected 2026-08-03: the 18th numbers county-specific orders with -b (Brevard) and -s (Seminole); unsuffixed orders are circuit-wide. This rule was bulk-tagged to one county at harvest; the court's own numbering convention now controls.
2 verbatim requirements from 4th Circuit Administrative Order 1986-33A.
1 verbatim requirement from 4th Circuit Administrative Order 1987-09.