Loading…
1 verbatim mandatory provision from 21-33-s.
Eighteenth Judicial Circuit. Check the order's own effective and rescission dates before relying on it. Procedural information only; not legal advice.
Verbatim from the order's own text layer, harvested 2026-07-24; whitespace normalised only. No OCR was used. Only sentences containing mandatory language (shall, must, may not, no later than, within N) are reproduced — the full document is in custody and is the controlling text. • JUDGES - Caseload Assignment - Reassignment of Cases Assigned to Judge Christopher Sprysenski ____________________________________________________________________________________ The court having determined that Judge Christopher Sprysenski should not hear cases in which attorneys Taylor Selig, Bar#1015957, Andrew Leeper, Bar#717029 and Steven Kramer, Bar#958441 appears, it is ORDERED that all pending or newly filed cases in which Taylor Selig, Bar#1015957, Andrew Leeper, Bar#717029 and Steven Kramer, Bar#958441 appears as attorney of record for any party shall be reassigned to the next judge in rotation pursuant to pending or existing administrative orders.
JUDGES - Caseload Assignment - Reassignment of Cases Assigned to Judge Christopher Sprysenski ____________________________________________________________________________________ The court having determined that Judge Christopher Sprysenski should not hear cases in which attorneys Taylor Selig, Bar#1015957, Andrew Leeper, Bar#717029 and Steven Kramer, Bar#958441 appears, it is ORDERED that all pending or newly filed cases in which Taylor Selig, Bar#1015957, Andrew Leeper, Bar#717029 and Steven Kramer, Bar#958441 appears as attorney of record for any party shall be reassigned to the next judge in rotation pursuant to pending or existing administrative orders.
Reviewer note: Document sha256: 1f51729800d45530a3ceb6393c0d0ec547570995393a39a0dd7f846cfa201ab3 (97684 bytes). BenchPath harvested this circuit itself because no research corpus existed for it. Extraction is conservative: mandatory-language sentences only, so this rule is a faithful subset of the order, never a summary of it.
2 verbatim requirements from 4th Circuit Administrative Order 1986-33A.
1 verbatim requirement from 4th Circuit Administrative Order 1987-09.