Loading…
8 verbatim mandatory provisions from 23-18.
Eighteenth Judicial Circuit. Check the order's own effective and rescission dates before relying on it. Procedural information only; not legal advice.
Verbatim from the order's own text layer, harvested 2026-07-24; whitespace normalised only. No OCR was used. Only sentences containing mandatory language (shall, must, may not, no later than, within N) are reproduced — the full document is in custody and is the controlling text. • WHEREAS, pursuant to the Chief Judge’s constitutional and statutory responsibility for administrative supervision of the courts within the circuit and considering available resources to create and maintain an organization capable of effecting the efficient, prompt, and proper administration of -- 1 of 16 -- 2 justice for the citizens of this State, the Chief Judge is required to provide direction, see, Fla. • There is created in Brevard and Seminole County a program that shall be known as the Alternative Sanctioning Program in accordance with s. 948.06(1)(h), F.S. • To be eligible for the program, offenders must have been placed on probation or community control under the supervision of the Department of Corrections by a judge in Brevard or Seminole County, have stable community ties, and have a stable residence in Brevard or Seminole County, Florida. • No offender -- 14 of 16 -- 15 is required to participate in the Alternative Sanctioning Program and may instead opt for a formal violation of probation or community control proceeding in Circuit Court. • If the offender elects to discontinue participation in the Alternative Sanctioning Program, the offender’s prior admission to the technical violation may not be used as evidence in subsequent proceedings B. • The judge shall review the “Alternative Sanctions Program Technical Violation Notification and Offender’s Waiver of Formal VOP/VOCC Hearing, Admission of Violation and Acceptance of Sanctions” (DC3-2027) form submitted and, if the judge agrees that the technical violation should be addressed via the Alternative Sanctions Program and agrees with the recommended sanction, the judge will sign the “Order - Alternative Sanctions Program”. • If the judge does not agree with the particular sanction recommended by the officer or does not agree that the technical violation should be addressed via the Alternative Sanctions Program, the judge shall reflect further instructions on the order. • The Alternative Sanctions Program shall be effective immediately and administered by the 18 th Judicial Circuit Court and the Florida Department of Corrections.
WHEREAS, pursuant to the Chief Judge’s constitutional and statutory responsibility for administrative supervision of the courts within the circuit and considering available resources to create and maintain an organization capable of effecting the efficient, prompt, and proper administration of -- 1 of 16 -- 2 justice for the citizens of this State, the Chief Judge is required to provide direction, see, Fla.
Reviewer note: Document sha256: 3846f4c60dd5de11e5bf804c4a325d0276db8d97280832a66cbf23485d0eb4b7 (122559 bytes). BenchPath harvested this circuit itself because no research corpus existed for it. Extraction is conservative: mandatory-language sentences only, so this rule is a faithful subset of the order, never a summary of it.
The 17th Circuit's circuit-wide AI disclosure/certification mandate (Jan 2026, twice amended) was VACATED in its entirety effective June 15, 2026 by Chief Judge Phillips's AO 2026-19-Gen, expressly citing the statewide framework (AOSC26-12; Rule 2.515(d)(2), SC2026-0673). Several division procedure pages still cite the vacated order.
Every circuit-civil case reviewed within 120 days of commencement and assigned a track (complex, streamlined, or general); case management orders required; firm continuance policy; sanctions for missed deadlines. Rescinds AO 21-09.
Circuit-civil hearing-availability standards: motion calendars ~2 weeks from request; 15-30 min special sets within 45-60 days; longer special sets scale.