Loading…
2 verbatim mandatory provisions from 24-46-s.
Eighteenth Judicial Circuit. Check the order's own effective and rescission dates before relying on it. Procedural information only; not legal advice.
• Orth should not hear cases in which attorneys from the Law Firm of Snedaker Law, including Shannon Snedaker, Bar#28042, Tim Snedaker, Bar#70715, Savanna Gaslin, Bar#1027895 and Benjamin Jones Bar#44285 appears, it is ORDERED that all pending or newly filed cases in which any of the attorneys from the Law Firm of Snedaker Law, including Shannon Snedaker, Bar#28042, Tim Snedaker, Bar#70715, Savanna Gaslin, Bar#1027895 and Benjamin Jones Bar#44285 appears as attorney of record for any party shall be reassigned to the next judge in rotation pursuant to pending or existing administrative orders, unless said attorney files a Notice of Appearance in a case with a known recusal order in effect. • If an attorney files a Notice of Appearance in a case with a known recusal order in effect, the case shall not be reassigned to the next judge in rotation.
Orth should not hear cases in which attorneys from the Law Firm of Snedaker Law, including Shannon Snedaker, Bar#28042, Tim Snedaker, Bar#70715, Savanna Gaslin, Bar#1027895 and Benjamin Jones Bar#44285 appears, it is ORDERED that all pending or newly filed cases in which any of the attorneys from the Law Firm of Snedaker Law, including Shannon Snedaker, Bar#28042, Tim Snedaker, Bar#70715, Savanna Gaslin, Bar#1027895 and Benjamin Jones Bar#44285 appears as attorney of record for any party shall be reassigned to the next judge in rotation pursuant to pending or existing administrative orders, unless said attorney files a Notice of Appearance in a case with a known recusal order in effect.
Reviewer note: Document sha256: 04592800b296ce247ca63d7399e28e0c6b0113cc8ebb31f226841ca8dbe88075 (95562 bytes). BenchPath harvested this circuit itself because no research corpus existed for it. Extraction is conservative: mandatory-language sentences only, so this rule is a faithful subset of the order, never a summary of it. Verbatim from the order's own text layer, harvested 2026-07-24; whitespace normalised only. No OCR was used. Only sentences containing mandatory language (shall, must, may not, no later than, within N) are reproduced — the full document is in custody and is the controlling text. [moved from the text 2026-09-14]
9 verbatim requirements from 4th Circuit Administrative Order 1997-10.
6 verbatim requirements from 4th Circuit Administrative Order 1997-13.