4th Cir. Admin. Order 1986-04 — Misdemeanant Probationers - Salvation Army Fees Increase THIRD AMENDED · BenchPath

Florida›Fourth Judicial Circuit

4th Cir. Admin. Order 1986-04 — Misdemeanant Probationers - Salvation Army Fees Increase THIRD AMENDED

High confidence· verified July 26, 2026Administrative Orders4th Jud. Cir. Admin. Order 1986-04 (Duval Clerk repository)

Summary

6 verbatim requirements from Fourth Circuit administrative order 1986-04 (a further document filed under the same order number).

Applies to

Fourth Judicial Circuit (Duval). Procedural information only; not legal advice.

Requirement

Verbatim from the operative section of this order, re-extracted 2026-07-26; whitespace normalised only. • For those defendants who are convicted for the first time operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of an intoxicating beverage, and are sentenced to do fifty (50) hours of community services through the Salvation Army, there shall be a one- ."-; time charge of Ten Dollars ($10.00) per misdemeanant for insurance coverage on the defendant. This Order shall be effective in all three counties of the Fourth Judicial Circuit.

Source of truth

For those defendants who are convicted for the first time operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of an intoxicating beverage, and are sentenced to do fifty (50) hours of community services through the Salvation Army, there shall be a one- ."-; time charge of Ten Dollars ($10.00) per misdemeanant for insurance coverage on the defendant. This Order shall be effective in all three counties of the Fourth Judicial Circuit.

Official source: Duval County Clerk of Courts — Fourth Circuit administrative orders
Source health: Healthy · checked July 26, 2026
Effective date: —
Last verified: July 26, 2026benchpath-reextract-2026-07-26

Reviewer note: Order PDF sha256: 4126f6a99bfaaa28c50d3454effe2e9798d0ee508ffbe5b2fe7e2ffada11e749. Extracted from the order's own text layer. One of several documents the Clerk publishes under order number 1986-04. | Set to in_review 2026-07-26: the order's subject looks practitioner-facing but the extracted text captured only recitals or an effective date, not the operative ORDERED section. This is an extraction defect, not a judgement that the order is unimportant — it needs re-extraction before it goes back on the published surface. | Re-extracted 2026-07-26 from the numbered paragraphs following the order's ORDERED clause, replacing a first pass that had captured recitals and the effective date. 1 further paragraph(s) were left out because their OCR is too corrupt to quote.