Loading…
1 verbatim requirement from Fourth Circuit administrative order 1986-34.
Fourth Judicial Circuit (Duval). Procedural information only; not legal advice.
Verbatim from the operative section of this order, re-extracted 2026-07-26; whitespace normalised only. • A ~iolation of Section 322.15, whether occurring before, on or after October 1, 1986, will be treated as a r " , V~L 6245 dODO " ~ -- .-...-......J.~ 'noncriminal traffic infraction, and any person so charged may elect to pay a $30.00 civil penalty to the Clerk's Office in lieu of a court appearance, pursuant to Section 318 .18 (2) as amended by Chapters 86-154 and 86-185. Any person who so elects shall also subrni t proof of compliance with Section 322.15 to the Clerk, in accordance with Section 3l8.14(4)(b), as amended by Chapter 86-185, and • A violation of Section 322.19, whether occurring before, on or after October 1, 1984, will be treated as a noncriminal traffic infraction, and any person so charged may elect to pay a $30.00 civil penalty to the Clerk's Office in lieu of a court appearance, pursuant to Section 318.18 (2) as amended by Chapter 86-154. DONE AND ORD~ in Florida, thiS~~Of Chambers at Jacksonville, Duval County, December, 1986. , .... .~ ..., -2- .. '
A ~iolation of Section 322.15, whether occurring before, on or after October 1, 1986, will be treated as a r " , V~L 6245 dODO " ~ -- .-...-......J.~ 'noncriminal traffic infraction, and any person so charged may elect to pay a $30.00 civil penalty to the Clerk's Office in lieu of a court appearance, pursuant to Section 318 .18 (2) as amended by Chapters 86-154 and 86-185. Any person who so elects shall also subrni t proof of compliance with Section 322.15 to the Clerk, in accordance with Section 3l8.14(4)(b), as amended by Chapter 86-185, and
Reviewer note: Order PDF sha256: 8840dcb6f2eff222f220800724c131b1db7f34d1d26096064051d0f96ed1040f. Extracted from the order's own text layer. Identity confirmed by the document's /Title. | Set to in_review 2026-07-26: the order's subject looks practitioner-facing but the extracted text captured only recitals or an effective date, not the operative ORDERED section. This is an extraction defect, not a judgement that the order is unimportant — it needs re-extraction before it goes back on the published surface. | Re-extracted 2026-07-26 from the numbered paragraphs following the order's ORDERED clause, replacing a first pass that had captured recitals and the effective date.
2 verbatim requirements from 4th Circuit Administrative Order 1986-33A.
1 verbatim requirement from Fourth Circuit administrative order 2003-06.