1 verbatim requirement from Fourth Circuit administrative order 1988-12.
Fourth Judicial Circuit (Duval). Procedural information only; not legal advice.
Verbatim from the order as served by the Duval Clerk's own application (https://www.duvalclerk.gov/adminOrders/?ao=1988-12&filed=03%2F21%2F1989&h=881a8ffd6809792c), captured 2026-08-04; each bullet is quoted whole from the document, whitespace normalised only. • |2rW 4 .4 4 - - -W -» 4- W 4 ' . 4 ` ’ · 4 ’ W — - _ W · 4 . " . ;·W -- 4 4 W 4 W . 4_ 4 - _ W 4 · 4 - . .- 4 4 4 v W W 44 4 4 5 4 »¤-· 4:··,;·· -.-= . . 4 4 4 ·· ·· 4 24 W .. 4 44 4 4 W · - . · W -- -~ ¢ 4 »2 4 4 4 4 4 V 4 EHS CIRCUQT “0UR'I3 OF 1Q 4 _4 _F¤URTH4.J”UD1‘CT.AL QI§tCUZQT,_.’ IN - 4 4 4 W ‘* 44 AND FOR DUVAL COUNTY, STATE 4 » OF FLORIDA- ‘ —- g W 1 -4 LL E D. r 44 f4 AMENQED ADMINISTRATIVE ORDERVH0. 88—12 W W _ 4 4 Q: tc: Administrative Order 5 jéipypy 5 I"’effec_i;.i.ngW-Arraigxgmeat and First Appearance I 4 ‘ 1 ‘ U hearings. ‘ 4 4 4 neun 4 brjrqihal Aclsrginiétrative Order N0. 8B—12 was entered May the requestj ` Q1: cme Suaize Gffice _the Cqunty. Judges , it is _ 4 ·‘ W T 1.. That misde1néanants‘wh¤ are released from euetcdy on bond ` 4 |Q_| otherwise and have 4_ V WW W W be given 4a repbrt j:¤_the Firsfc `T the _4 ___Qigpgppse4 L cf 4 “i· which preceeding: shall comneuceet 9:00 A4. M. 4 4 4 4W I 2, A All ‘¤the_r defendagate will be First Appearance A. car 2:60 B. M. daily for First _ A ‘``‘i ·- 4. 4 Q` me April 1, 4, in Chambers at Jacgkecmvilie-, Duval Ceuntf 4 4| __ _· `_ Y- T 4W CHIFJUDGE e 4 4 W W 4 4 44 4 444W4{I, 4
I That misdemeanants who are released •from custody on bond • and have• not. othéZü1Se -.bee.n_: zed be qiven a dat.e to report the First . . —-..for the. -purpose - •arraignment. , which proceedings - shall • at g: 00 A.
Reviewer note: Order PDF sha256: 881a8ffd6809792c175858680af608ae006c22044a39e34d75eb06cc08ee76cc. Extracted from the order's own text layer. Identity confirmed by the document's /Title. | Set to in_review 2026-07-26: the order's subject looks practitioner-facing but the extracted text captured only recitals or an effective date, not the operative ORDERED section. This is an extraction defect, not a judgement that the order is unimportant — it needs re-extraction before it goes back on the published surface. | Re-extraction 2026-07-26: the operative section was located, but every paragraph in it is OCR of a scanned typescript too corrupt to quote verbatim. No requirement is published from it. The order remains held and sha256-hashed as a source document. | OCR recovery 2026-07-26: the order's embedded text layer was an old, corrupt OCR pass, so the page images were re-rendered at 300 dpi and read again with the Windows OCR engine. Confidence is MEDIUM and the text is labelled as non-verbatim, because fresh OCR of a typewritten carbon copy still misreads characters. Document sha256 881a8ffd6809792c175858680af608ae006c22044a39e34d75eb06cc08ee76cc; 1 paragraph(s) were still too corrupt to use. [RECOMPOSED VERBATIM 2026-08-04 (campaign wave, browser-verified): the order renders only inside the Clerk's application; captured via the court's own app, PDF sha256 881a8ffd6809792c175858680af608ae006c22044a39e34d75eb06cc08ee76cc; 1 bullet(s) quoted whole from the document.]
2 verbatim requirements from 4th Circuit Administrative Order 1986-33A.
1 verbatim requirement from Fourth Circuit administrative order 2003-06.