15 verbatim requirements from Fourth Circuit administrative order 1988-21 (a further document filed under the same order number).
Fourth Judicial Circuit (Duval). Procedural information only; not legal advice.
Verbatim from Fourth Circuit administrative order 1988-21 as published by the Duval County Clerk, harvested 2026-07-26; whitespace normalised only. • It is thereupon, ORDERED that all cases meeting the following criteria (and ONLY such cases), shall be filed in Divisions CR-D and CR-F, the Repeat Offender Court (ROC); • Manslaughter shall be randomly assigned to Division CR-A, CR-B, CR-C, CR-D, • MULTIPLE DEFENDANTS OR CASES ln any case involving multiple defendants, if any one defendant meets the criteria set forth in paragraphs one, two, three, four or five, the defendant and all co- defendants shall be assigned to the ROC division. lf any defendant or co-defendant has a case meeting the criteria set forth in paragraphs one, two, three, four or five and has a separate pending felony case, that pending case and the case meeting the criteria in paragraphs one, two, three, four or five shall be assigned to a ROC division. • All violation of probation cases, and the cases of any co-defendants, arising out of non-ROC divisions shall be heard and determined by the non-ROC divisions assigned unless the probationer is arrested after June 11, 1990, on a new charge which meets the criteria of a ROC division. • In that event, the violation of probation case, the new substantive case, and the cases of any co-defendants shall be assigned to a ROC division, through a random computer selection. • All violation of probation cases in which the probationer was placed on probation by a ROC division shall be assigned, together with any new charges against the probationer, and the cases of any co-defendants, to the ROC division that placed the probationer on probation. • All violation of probation cases in which the probationer was placed on probation by Division CR-D prior to May 1, 1990, shall be governed by the rule set forth in paragraph nine (9) hereinabove except that the case(s) shall be equally assigned though a random computer selection to one of the non-ROC divisions it the case(s) are not ROC eligible as defined in paragraph nine (9)- • All Division CR-D cases in which a capias was issued prior to May 1, 1990, shall, in the event the defendant is arrested on such a capias, be equally assigned through a random computer selection to a non-ROC division, unless the case meets the ROC criteria hereinabove, in which event it will remain in CR-D. • 3.850 or other post-judgment matters shall be heard and determined by the Judge of Division CR-D. • All Division CR-D cases which have been sentenced and reversed on appeal shall be retried or resentenced in accordance with the appellate mandate by • All oases for which State Attorney numbers are assigned on or between May 1, 1990, and June 11, 1990, inclusive, and which meet the ROC criteria set forth hereinabove, shall be assigned to Division CR-D. • All cases for which the State Attorney numbers are assigned on or after June 12, 1990, and which meet the ROC criteria set forth hereinabove, shall be assigned or transferred to either CR-D or CR-F, through a random computer selection. • All ROC eligible non-probation cases in which State Attorney numbers were assigned before May 1, 1990, and which are pending in error in a non-ROC division, notwithstanding that they meet ROC criteria, shall be assigned by a random computer selection to either CR-D or CR-F upon the transfer of any of said cases from the non-ROC divisions. • This Administrative Order shall be recorded by the Clerk of the Court, in the • Official Records of Duval County, in the State of Florida, and shall take effect immediately and remain in full force and effect unless and until otherwise ordered by the Court.
It is thereupon, ORDERED that all cases meeting the following criteria (and ONLY such cases), shall be filed in Divisions CR-D and CR-F, the Repeat Offender Court (ROC);
Reviewer note: Order PDF sha256: 0b42a7267463154f5aa3deb50afc85b3431952b24ae1e5dcaf6358f5cc99d714. Extracted from the order's own text layer. One of several documents the Clerk publishes under order number 1988-21.
18 verbatim requirements from 5th Jud. Cir., M-2018-65 — sha256-hashed 2026-07-25.
13 verbatim requirements from 5th Jud. Cir., Interpreter Services – English — sha256-hashed 2026-07-25.
25 verbatim mandatory provisions from AO 2022-004.