4th Cir. Admin. Order 1996-20 — Administrative Order No. 96-20 Duties of Administrative Family Law Judge · BenchPath

Florida›Fourth Judicial Circuit

4th Cir. Admin. Order 1996-20 — Administrative Order No. 96-20 Duties of Administrative Family Law Judge

Medium — verify before relying· verified July 26, 2026Administrative Orders4th Jud. Cir. Admin. Order 1996-20 (Duval Clerk repository)

Official rule; awaiting reverification against the current source text. Verify with the clerk, judicial assistant, or official court website before relying on it.

Summary

4 verbatim requirements from Fourth Circuit administrative order 1996-20 (a further document filed under the same order number).

Applies to

Fourth Judicial Circuit (Duval). Procedural information only; not legal advice.

Requirement

Recovered by optical character recognition from the scanned order, 2026-07-26. THIS IS NOT A VERBATIM QUOTATION — the original is a scanned typescript and OCR can misread characters. Check the order itself before relying on any wording. • (D) This Order shall be recorded in the Offcial Records of Duval County in the State of Florida, and copies furnished by the Clerk of the Court to the Jacksonville Bar Association. day o ND ORDERED in Chambers at Jacksonville, Duval County, Florida, this , 1996.

Source of truth

(D) This Order shall be recorded in the Offcial Records of Duval County in the State of Florida, and copies furnished by the Clerk of the Court to the Jacksonville Bar Association. day o ND ORDERED in Chambers at Jacksonville, Duval County, Florida, this , 1996.

Official source: Duval County Clerk of Courts — Fourth Circuit administrative orders
Source health: Healthy · checked July 26, 2026
Effective date: —
Last verified: July 26, 2026benchpath-ocr-2026-07-26

Reviewer note: Order PDF sha256: 5905da3c6c3b2ddbe88778e094e3c340236421c0226b1c7a35df844760a14200. Extracted from the order's own text layer. One of several documents the Clerk publishes under order number 1996-20. | Set to in_review 2026-07-26: the order's subject looks practitioner-facing but the extracted text captured only recitals or an effective date, not the operative ORDERED section. This is an extraction defect, not a judgement that the order is unimportant — it needs re-extraction before it goes back on the published surface. | Re-extraction 2026-07-26: the operative section was located, but every paragraph in it is OCR of a scanned typescript too corrupt to quote verbatim. No requirement is published from it. The order remains held and sha256-hashed as a source document. | OCR recovery 2026-07-26: the order's embedded text layer was an old, corrupt OCR pass, so the page images were re-rendered at 300 dpi and read again with the Windows OCR engine. Confidence is MEDIUM and the text is labelled as non-verbatim, because fresh OCR of a typewritten carbon copy still misreads characters. Document sha256 7f4928e1f3195995767366552fe78347f971a88975f6ff5de8b30a57c78b6cca.