4th Cir. Admin. Order 2001-10 — Baker / Marchman, Developmental Disabilities Involuntary Admissions and Inmate Mental Health Hearings SECOND Amended- DUVAL COUNTY · BenchPath

Florida›Fourth Judicial Circuit

4th Cir. Admin. Order 2001-10 — Baker / Marchman, Developmental Disabilities Involuntary Admissions and Inmate Mental Health Hearings SECOND Amended- DUVAL COUNTY

High confidence· verified July 26, 2026Administrative Orders4th Jud. Cir. Admin. Order 2001-10 (Duval Clerk repository)

Summary

3 verbatim requirements from Fourth Circuit administrative order 2001-10 (a further document filed under the same order number).

Applies to

Fourth Judicial Circuit (Duval). Procedural information only; not legal advice.

Requirement

Verbatim from the operative section of this order, re-extracted 2026-07-26; whitespace normalised only. • (A) Hearings held pursuant to section 394.451 ct seq. ofthe Florida Statues, otherwise known as the Baker Act, shall be held before a duly appointed hearing officer at the Duval County Court`s Beach Boulevard location, beginning January 1, 2002; • (B) Hearings held pursuant to section 397.301 et seq. of the Florida Statutes, otherwise knows as the Marchman Act, shall be held before a duly appointed hearing officer at the Duval County Court’s Beach Boulevard location, beginning January 1. 2002;

Source of truth

(A) Hearings held pursuant to section 394.451 ct seq. ofthe Florida Statues, otherwise known as the Baker Act, shall be held before a duly appointed hearing officer at the Duval County Court`s Beach Boulevard location, beginning January 1, 2002;

Official source: Duval County Clerk of Courts — Fourth Circuit administrative orders
Source health: Healthy · checked July 26, 2026
Effective date: —
Last verified: July 26, 2026benchpath-reextract-2026-07-26

Reviewer note: Order PDF sha256: f53b2791e3e4624658b7264f9c0b899111cfb2b5542467bf759eb60497b9b710. Extracted from the order's own text layer. One of several documents the Clerk publishes under order number 2001-10. | Set to in_review 2026-07-26: the order's subject looks practitioner-facing but the extracted text captured only recitals or an effective date, not the operative ORDERED section. This is an extraction defect, not a judgement that the order is unimportant — it needs re-extraction before it goes back on the published surface. | Re-extracted 2026-07-26 from the numbered paragraphs following the order's ORDERED clause, replacing a first pass that had captured recitals and the effective date.