4th Cir. Admin. Order 2009-02 — Administrative Order 2009-02 First Coast Crime Stoppers - Assessment of Cost by Clerk's Office · BenchPath

Florida›Fourth Judicial Circuit

4th Cir. Admin. Order 2009-02 — Administrative Order 2009-02 First Coast Crime Stoppers - Assessment of Cost by Clerk's Office

High confidence· verified July 26, 2026Administrative Orders4th Jud. Cir. Admin. Order 2009-02 (Duval Clerk repository)

Summary

3 verbatim requirements from Fourth Circuit administrative order 2009-02 (a further document filed under the same order number).

Applies to

Fourth Judicial Circuit (Duval). Procedural information only; not legal advice.

Requirement

Verbatim from the operative section of this order, re-extracted 2026-07-26; whitespace normalised only. • That in addition to any court E prescribed by law for any criminal offense (regardless of whether adjudication is withheld), there shall be assessed as a court cost, an additional surcharge of tweng dollars §$20[ on such fine, which will be imposed by all criminal circuit and county counts, and such surcharge will be collected by the Office of the Clerk of Court and earmarked for the Crime Stoppers Trust Fund pursuant to § 938.06, Florida Statutes;

Source of truth

That in addition to any court E prescribed by law for any criminal offense (regardless of whether adjudication is withheld), there shall be assessed as a court cost, an additional surcharge of tweng dollars §$20[ on such fine, which will be imposed by all criminal circuit and county counts, and such surcharge will be collected by the Office of the Clerk of Court and earmarked for the Crime Stoppers Trust Fund pursuant to § 938.06, Florida Statutes;

Official source: Duval County Clerk of Courts — Fourth Circuit administrative orders
Source health: Healthy · checked July 26, 2026
Effective date: —
Last verified: July 26, 2026benchpath-reextract-2026-07-26

Reviewer note: Order PDF sha256: b18988930230ebf6f3eafe72bdc76a2bd7d57df5aec3fb11bac6ee5f7cb603fc. Extracted from the order's own text layer. One of several documents the Clerk publishes under order number 2009-02. | Set to in_review 2026-07-26: the order's subject looks practitioner-facing but the extracted text captured only recitals or an effective date, not the operative ORDERED section. This is an extraction defect, not a judgement that the order is unimportant — it needs re-extraction before it goes back on the published surface. | Re-extracted 2026-07-26 from the numbered paragraphs following the order's ORDERED clause, replacing a first pass that had captured recitals and the effective date. 1 further paragraph(s) were left out because their OCR is too corrupt to quote.