Judge Mitchell D. Bishop: Filing — Union County, FL · BenchPath

Eighth Cir. — Judge Mitchell D. Bishop: Filing

Medium — verify before relying· verified July 24, 2026E-FilingEighth Judicial Circuit, Union County Court, Delinquency, Shelter, and Mental Health Division Procedures – The Eighth Judicial Circuit of Florida; Judge Mitchell D. Bishop’s Division Procedures – The Eighth Judicial Circuit of Florida (pp. PAGE INTRODUCTION, E-Filing Portal Contact Information:, Submission Method:, Requirements:) — captured and sha256-hashed 2026-07-24

Official rule; awaiting reverification against the current source text. Verify with the clerk, judicial assistant, or official court website before relying on it.

Summary

4 verbatim requirements on filing.

Applies to

Eighth Judicial Circuit — Judge Mitchell D. Bishop only. Practices change without notice; the court's own published text controls. Procedural information only; not legal advice.

Source of truth

Union County Court, Delinquency, Shelter, and Mental Health Division Procedures UNREPRESENTED OR PRO-SE PARTIES - Parties not represented by counsel should provide proposed orders and final judgments either directly to the Clerk of Court or to Judicial Assistant Hannah Seay - Unrepresented or pro se (self-represented) litigants may email proposed orders and final judgments to Judicial Assistant Hannah Seay at seayh@circuit8.org. - Please note that the Florida Courts Electronic Filing Portal (E-Portal) permits self-represented litigants to register with and file pleadings with the Court electronically through the E-Portal. The E-Portal is accessible at the following link: https://www.myflcourtaccess.com/default.aspx. - For all parties who do not have access to email to provide documents electronically or have not consented to use of email service, self-addressed, stamped envelopes without

Official source: 8th Circuit — Administrative Orders
Source health: Healthy · checked October 24, 2026
Effective date: —
Last verified: July 24, 2026benchpath-completeness-2026-07-24

Provenance record

Source sha256: bfbb99e9454aa510db3ac211a89e044ed07754e429f5b62027cfdd8cc737d5ed, d5fffd70c82496ba5b7e30201c3c6cc22907a8c6a0b9b053d766ec2c71b33d4b. Corpus categories: COURTESY_COPIES | PROPOSED_ORDERS | FILING_OR_SERVICE, FILING_OR_SERVICE. Operative status as recorded: LIVE_PAGE_CURRENT_AS_CRAWLED. Published during the 2026-07-24 completeness pass. SOURCE DRIFT MEASURED 2026-07-24: the page(s) these requirements were captured from have been edited since capture. A live re-read found 12 of 13 published requirements (92%) still present on 1 source page (/courts-judges/judge-mitchell-bishop/judge-mitchel-bishop-division-procedures/). The missing text may have been reworded, moved, or withdrawn — BenchPath does not guess which. Confidence held at high because the overwhelming majority survived verbatim. Re-verify before relying on any single clause. Confidence set to medium 2026-09-08 (H3 re-verification): the live official document no longer carries this text verbatim — see the open change_detected task on its source. Verbatim from the published source, captured 2026-07-24; whitespace normalised only. No OCR was used. [moved from the text 2026-09-14]

Small Claims County Civil

Change history

August 5, 2026Monitor: content changed at 8th Circuit — Administrative Orders. Review before republishing dependent rules.
August 4, 2026Monitor: content changed at 8th Circuit — Administrative Orders. Review before republishing dependent rules.
August 3, 2026Monitor: content changed at 8th Circuit — Administrative Orders. Review before republishing dependent rules.
August 2, 2026Monitor: content changed at 8th Circuit — Administrative Orders. Review before republishing dependent rules.
August 1, 2026Monitor: content changed at 8th Circuit — Administrative Orders. Review before republishing dependent rules.
July 31, 2026Monitor: content changed at 8th Circuit — Administrative Orders. Review before republishing dependent rules.
July 30, 2026Monitor: content changed at 8th Circuit — Administrative Orders. Review before republishing dependent rules.
July 29, 2026Monitor: content changed at 8th Circuit — Administrative Orders. Review before republishing dependent rules.
July 27, 2026Monitor: content changed at 8th Circuit — Administrative Orders. Review before republishing dependent rules.

139th District Court (Hidalgo County) — Standing Order: e-filing required for all family-law and civil documents from October 21, 2013 (signed October 18, 2013)

A 2013 standing order requiring attorneys to e-file family-law and civil documents (no paper filings accepted) as the court began compliance with the Supreme Court's e-filing mandate; criminal filing unchanged.

High confidence· verified September 10, 2026Standing Order of the Hidalgo County 139th district court regarding e-filing (2013), posted on www.hidalgocounty.us/208/e-Filing; captured 2026-09-10.

E-FilingHidalgo County · Judge Sergio Valdez

County Court at Law No. 7 (Hidalgo County) — Standing Order: e-filing required for all family-law documents (District Clerk) and civil documents (County Clerk) from October 21, 2013