Skip to main content

E.D.N.Y. Administrative Order No. 2021-03 — Modification of Condition of Supervision (Third-Party Risk)

High confidence· verified November 7, 2026Administrative Orders

A published court requirement that applies in New York. Category: Administrative Orders. Verified against the official source (E.D.N.Y. — Compendium of Administrative Orders Relevant to Practitioners (U.S. District Court, Eastern District of New York)) on November 7, 2026.

Summary

Modification of Condition of Supervision (Third-Party Risk) (Administrative Order No. 2021-03): the court's own administrative order as its Compendium of Administrative Orders Relevant to Practitioners (orders effective as of July 11, 2025) compiles it, verbatim from the official PDF (sha-custodied). Court-level requirement: governs practice in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York alongside the Local Rules, the federal rules and any judge-specific procedures.

Requirement

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK --------------------------------------------------------------------X IN RE: MODIFICATION OF THE STANDARD CONDITION OF SUPERVISION PERTAINING TO THIRD-PARTY RISK --------------------------------------------------------------------X ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER NO. 2021-03 WHEREAS, Standard Condition #12 of the Standard Conditions of Supervised Release currently included in this Court’s Judgment in a Criminal Case (“Current Standard Condition #12”) reads as follows: If the probation officer determines that you pose a risk to another person (including an organization), the probation officer may require you to notify the person about the risk and you must comply with that instruction. The probation officer may contact the person and confirm that you have notified the person about the risk; and WHEREAS, in United States v. Boles, 914 F.3d 95 (2d Cir. 2019), the Second Circuit held that the language used in Current Standard Condition #12 impermissibly accords too much discretion to the probation officer; and WHEREAS, in light of Boles, the Court intends that all defendants upon whom Current Standard Condition Number #12 was imposed should be relieved of that condition immediately, and without the need for motion practice or further judicial proceedings; NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby ORDERED that all judgments entered in this Court in which Current Standard Condition #12 was imposed are hereby modified to remove from the judgment Current Standard Condition #12, and any defendant who was sentenced subject to Current Standard Condition #12 is immediately relieved from the requirements of said condition; and IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the form used in this Court for any Judgment in a Criminal Case be modified to incorporate a new standard third-party risk condition (“Revised Standard Condition #12”) as follows: If the probation officer determines based on your criminal record, personal history and characteristics, and the nature and circumstances of your offense, you pose a risk to another person (including an organization), the probation officer, with prior approval of the Court, may require you to notify the person about the risk and you must comply with that instruction. The probation officer may contact the person and confirm that you have notified the person about the risk; and IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that in any case, including any case with a judgment affected by this Order, in which the probation officer believes that a third-party risk condition is warranted, the probation officer shall recommend to the Court that Revised Standard Condition #12 be imposed, and, if the Court accepts the recommendation, Revised Standard Condition #12 shall be imposed. SO ORDERED. Dated: Brooklyn, New York February , 2021 MARGO K. BRODIE Chief Untied States District Judge

Source of truth

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK --------------------------------------------------------------------X IN RE: MODIFICATION OF THE STANDARD CONDITION OF SUPERVISION PERTAINING TO THIRD-PARTY RISK ------------------------------------------------------------
Source health
Healthy · checked November 14, 2026
Effective date
—
Last verified
November 7, 2026benchpath-nyfed-orders-2026-11-07

Related rules

Administrative OrdersFourth Judicial Circuit

4th Cir. — AO 1997-10 Amended Administrative Order No. 97-10 Pro Se Referals to Family Mediation

9 verbatim requirements from 4th Circuit Administrative Order 1997-10.

High confidence· verified September 8, 2026Fourth Judicial Circuit Administrative Order 1997-10, filed 05/29/1997, published on the Duval Clerk's administrative-orders store — sha256-hashed 2026-08-03
Administrative OrdersFourth Judicial Circuit

4th Cir. — AO 1997-13 Second Amended Administrative Order No. 97-13 Violation of Open Container Ordinances

6 verbatim requirements from 4th Circuit Administrative Order 1997-13.

High confidence· verified August 3, 2026Fourth Judicial Circuit Administrative Order 1997-13, filed 06/27/1997, published on the Duval Clerk's administrative-orders store — sha256-hashed 2026-08-03
Administrative OrdersFourth Judicial Circuit

4th Cir. — AO 1997-16 Amended Administrative Order No. 97-16 Family Law; Fourth Judicial Circuit Visitation Guid

15 verbatim requirements from 4th Circuit Administrative Order 1997-16.

High confidence· verified August 3, 2026Fourth Judicial Circuit Administrative Order 1997-16, filed 01/22/1998, published on the Duval Clerk's administrative-orders store — sha256-hashed 2026-08-03
Administrative OrdersFourth Judicial Circuit

4th Cir. — AO 1997-18 Administrative Order No. 97-18 Animal Care and Control

5 verbatim requirements from 4th Circuit Administrative Order 1997-18.

High confidence· verified August 3, 2026Fourth Judicial Circuit Administrative Order 1997-18, filed 10/04/1997, published on the Duval Clerk's administrative-orders store — sha256-hashed 2026-08-03