Justice Court Precinct 3, Place 1's standing policy (adopted from the declaratory judgment in Hunt v. The Trellis at Lake Highlands, Dallas County Court at Law No. 5, No. CC-22-02457-E, decided Sept. 19, 2022): no writ of possession issues where an eviction appeal has been perfected by bond or by a statement of inability to afford the appeal bond; non-payment-of-rent appeals are processed like holdover appeals, jurisdiction passes to the County Courts at Law, and the writ issues only where no appeal is perfected.
Texas > Dallas County > Justice of the Peace, Precinct 3, Place 1 (Hon. Adam M. Swartz) — eviction cases where an appeal is perfected by bond or statement of inability; the underlying declaratory order issued from Dallas County Court at Law No. 5
Reviewer note: Own-site instrument composed verbatim (custody sha in the crawl ledger); the effective date is the decision date the policy adopts (Sept. 19, 2022; posted Dec. 6, 2023); the current bench (Swartz) is named in the document header — the decided-era officers (Judge Cercone, Constable Adamcik) appear historically; the constitutional holding is quoted as the county court's order, not asserted as BenchPath's characterization of statewide law.
Standing order of the 109th Judicial District Court for every pending or later-filed case in Andrews, Winkler and Crane Counties: any attorney or self-represented litigant who uses any form of artificial intelligence for legal research or drafting in a case must, before using AI-generated information in a court submission or proceeding, sign and submit the court's certification form stating that all language, quotations, sources, citations, arguments and legal analysis created or contributed to by generative AI were verified as accurate by a human through traditional (non-AI) legal sources, and acknowledging responsibility and potential sanctions for their or their co-counsel's failure to comply. Effective immediately; in effect until rescinded or replaced.
Standing order of the 109th Judicial District Court for every pending or later-filed case in Andrews, Winkler and Crane Counties: any attorney or self-represented litigant who uses any form of artificial intelligence for legal research or drafting in a case must, before using AI-generated information in a court submission or proceeding, sign and submit the court's certification form stating that all language, quotations, sources, citations, arguments and legal analysis created or contributed to by generative AI were verified as accurate by a human through traditional (non-AI) legal sources, and acknowledging responsibility and potential sanctions for their or their co-counsel's failure to comply. Effective immediately; in effect until rescinded or replaced.
Verified requirements for Judge Adam M. Swartz unlocks with a Single Report ($29) or Professional ($99/month) — create a free account to preview the dossier first.
Unlock free →Verified the action checklist unlocks with a Single Report ($29) or Professional ($99/month) — create a free account to preview the dossier first.
Unlock free →