The 68th District Court's Standing Order for Disclosure of Information Before Hearing to Approve Transfer of Structured Settlement Payments (Hon. Martin Hoffman, Oct. 24, 2020): implementing the CPRC §141.004 express findings, the annuitant/transferor and transferee must each file ten sworn disclosures at least five business days before the approval hearing — financial resources, debts, assets, foreseeable liabilities and needs, intended use of the lump sum, dependents, percentage assigned, and full prior-transfer and denied-application histories.
Texas > Dallas County > 68th District Court (Hon. Martin Hoffman) — applications to approve transfers of structured settlement payments under CPRC ch. 141
Reviewer note: Registered scan composed by vision (pages rendered and read 2026-08-28); "SO ORDERED this 24TH day of OCTOBER, 2020" over Judge Martin Hoffman's signature — the signing judge remains the OCA bench (Martin J. Hoffman); custody sha256 in the registry ledger (doc 1138); the court hosts the same order own-site (68thCivilDistrict-StandardOrders-20191023 PDF, vision-verified same instrument; custody sha in the crawl ledger).
Standing order of the 109th Judicial District Court for every pending or later-filed case in Andrews, Winkler and Crane Counties: any attorney or self-represented litigant who uses any form of artificial intelligence for legal research or drafting in a case must, before using AI-generated information in a court submission or proceeding, sign and submit the court's certification form stating that all language, quotations, sources, citations, arguments and legal analysis created or contributed to by generative AI were verified as accurate by a human through traditional (non-AI) legal sources, and acknowledging responsibility and potential sanctions for their or their co-counsel's failure to comply. Effective immediately; in effect until rescinded or replaced.
Standing order of the 109th Judicial District Court for every pending or later-filed case in Andrews, Winkler and Crane Counties: any attorney or self-represented litigant who uses any form of artificial intelligence for legal research or drafting in a case must, before using AI-generated information in a court submission or proceeding, sign and submit the court's certification form stating that all language, quotations, sources, citations, arguments and legal analysis created or contributed to by generative AI were verified as accurate by a human through traditional (non-AI) legal sources, and acknowledging responsibility and potential sanctions for their or their co-counsel's failure to comply. Effective immediately; in effect until rescinded or replaced.
Verified requirements for Judge Martin J. Hoffman unlocks with a Single Report ($29) or Professional ($99/month) — create a free account to preview the dossier first.
Unlock free →Verified the action checklist unlocks with a Single Report ($29) or Professional ($99/month) — create a free account to preview the dossier first.
Unlock free →