Loading…
JP Precinct 3's enforced courtroom dress code (referenced by the precinct's posted court rules, which state the approved dress code "will be enforced"): the court may refuse entry to anyone it deems inappropriately dressed — no offensive-slogan T-shirts, halter/tank/spaghetti-strap/sleeveless tops, shorts, hats, sunglasses, bandanas, sagging pants, backpacks, or weapons, plus a judge's catch-all — and no food or drink in the courtroom.
Texas > Ellis County > Justice of the Peace, Precinct 3 (Judge Dan Douglas Cox, Waxahachie) — everyone entering the courtroom. The instrument's own text names Precinct 3; the county posts the PDF on its Precinct Four page (a posting-vein anomaly recorded at capture) while Precinct 3's posted court rules independently state the approved dress code is on the website and enforced.
Reviewer note: Text-layer document transcribed verbatim in full (sha256 per fetch ledger, 44,948 B). Attribution follows the instrument's own text ("Precinct 3") under the full-text-adjudication doctrine; the Precinct-Four posting-page anomaly is noted rather than resolved by guess. Composed benchpath-ajr1-p6.
Standing order of the 109th Judicial District Court for every pending or later-filed case in Andrews, Winkler and Crane Counties: any attorney or self-represented litigant who uses any form of artificial intelligence for legal research or drafting in a case must, before using AI-generated information in a court submission or proceeding, sign and submit the court's certification form stating that all language, quotations, sources, citations, arguments and legal analysis created or contributed to by generative AI were verified as accurate by a human through traditional (non-AI) legal sources, and acknowledging responsibility and potential sanctions for their or their co-counsel's failure to comply. Effective immediately; in effect until rescinded or replaced.
Standing order of the 109th Judicial District Court for every pending or later-filed case in Andrews, Winkler and Crane Counties: any attorney or self-represented litigant who uses any form of artificial intelligence for legal research or drafting in a case must, before using AI-generated information in a court submission or proceeding, sign and submit the court's certification form stating that all language, quotations, sources, citations, arguments and legal analysis created or contributed to by generative AI were verified as accurate by a human through traditional (non-AI) legal sources, and acknowledging responsibility and potential sanctions for their or their co-counsel's failure to comply. Effective immediately; in effect until rescinded or replaced.
Verified requirements for Judge Dan Douglas Cox unlocks with a Single Report ($29) or Professional ($99/month) — create a free account to preview the dossier first.
Unlock free →Verified the action checklist unlocks with a Single Report ($29) or Professional ($99/month) — create a free account to preview the dossier first.
Unlock free →