Loading…
Rule 19 (19.1 to 19.5): communication among the criminal, family and juvenile departments on domestic violence orders (19.1); no protective or custody order in conflict with an order of the criminal court (19.2); modification of criminal orders (19.3); coexisting criminal and family or juvenile orders and the safe exchange of children (19.4); and a certified copy of each order conveyed within 24 hours to the Butte County Sheriff’s Department for CLETS (19.5).
California > Third Appellate District > Butte County > Superior Court of California, County of Butte
LOCAL RULE 19 DOMESTIC VIOLENCE COORDINATION RULES (Effective 7/1/04) 19.1 COURT COMMUNICATION (Effective date 7/1/04) A. Until the Court has an operational case management system capable of automatically coordinating domestic violence orders, the Court’s criminal, family and juvenile law departments shall communicate and exchange information with each other prior to issuing protective orders and child custody and visitation order to determine if any such orders have already been issued as to the same parties or children in any other department (Effective date 7/1/04) 19.2 AVOIDING CONFLICTING ORDERS (Effective date 7/1/04) A. No department or the family or Juvenile Court shall issue a protective order or custody order in conflict with an order of the criminal Court. In the event such an order issues inadvertently, the orders of the criminal law proceeding shall control. (Effective date 7/1/04) 19.3 MODIFICATION OF CRIMINAL ORDERS (Effective date 7/1/04) A. A Court issuing a criminal Court protective order may, after consultation with the appropriate department of the family or Juvenile Court, modify the criminal Court protective order to allow or restrict contact between the restrained person and his or her children, spouse, or other protected person. (Effective date 7/1/04) 19.4 COEXISTING CRIMINAL AND FAMILY OR JUVENILE ORDERS (Effective date 7/1/04) A. A family or Juvenile Court order may coexist with a criminal Court protective order, subject to the following: 1. Any order that permits contact between the restrained person and his or her children shall provide for the safe exchange of the children and shall not contain language either printed or handwritten that violates a “no contact order” issued by a criminal Court. 2. Safety of all parties shall be the Courts’ paramount concern. The family or Juvenile Court order shall specify the time, day, place, and manner of transfer of the child, as provided in Section 3100 of the Family Code. (Effective date 7/1/04) 19.5 ISSUANCE AND ENFORCEMENT OF RESTRAINING ORDERS (Effective date 7/1/04) A. Upon granting of relief, (through initial petition, modification or termination), the clerk shall convey within 24 hours a certified copy of the order to the Butte County Sheriff’s Department (BCSO) for input into CLETS, a statewide computerized registration system for restraining orders. (Effective date 7/1/04)
LOCAL RULE 19 DOMESTIC VIOLENCE COORDINATION RULES (Effective 7/1/04) 19.1 COURT COMMUNICATION (Effective date 7/1/04) A. Until the Court has an operational case management system capable of automatically coordinating domestic violence orders, the Court’s criminal, family and juvenile law departments shall communicate and exchange information with each other prior to issuing protective orders and
Reviewer note: Composed 2026-10-10 (California T4 Butte build 2026-10-10) from BenchPath custody ca/t4/ca-butte/docs/local-rules/local-rules-january-2026-final-edit_san.pdf (the court's rule book, its cover “Local Court Rules Effective July 1, 2026”, as fetched 2026-10-10; 6485001 bytes, sha256 043b7a23248fccbde751232510b0b283759182bb05446c97c68478f2adcb12b1; 229 pages; this rule PDF page 118) with the shared verbatim composer (v2 reflow) and its strike-out: 19 rules - 1 to 4, 6, 9, 12 to 22, 50 and 51 - each composed from its own pages (PDF pages 14 to 126, printed “Page 1 of 216” to “Page 113 of 216”), from its heading (“LOCAL RULE 1 GENERAL RULES”, with its history note on the same row) to its last history note: each page's running header (“SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF BUTTE RULES”) and its two footer lines (the rule's name and “Page N of 216”) removed as chrome - PDF page 24, a Rule 2 page, prints Rule 1's name in its footer, removed there too; lines reflowed into the rules' paragraphs, each rule's heading and each subdivision's label and title (“2.1 APPLICABILITY”) set as one line, as printed on one row; the strike report (review/strike-report-2026-10-10.txt) finds no struck run; 14 whitespace-only fixes (build/book-fixes.json: eleven complaint addresses in Rules 6, 9, 16, 17 and 51 whose street the reflow ran into the court's name, each street set on its own line as printed; Rule 2.6(B)'s transcript request address set on its four lines; Rule 2.16's empty label “D.” set apart from Rule 2.17's heading; Rule 16.27's “c)Training” set on its own line) and no same-character fix; the vertical-gap, short-line, page-break, bold-line, false-break, fragment and row audits (custody file book_extra_audits.py; review/book-extra-audits-2026-10-10.txt) list candidates read one by one; proof 1 (whitespace-only) and proof 2 (same character multiset as the text layer minus chrome) pass. The cover, the list of the rules with their effective dates, the applicability statement, the table of contents, the abbreviations, the subject index, the forms indexes and the local forms printed as page images (PDF pages 127 to 229) belong to no card.
Division XI: information forms for data processing (Rule 11.2); required action - action taken on all calendared cases and a future date always set (Rule 11.19); and pro tem judges - an attorney named as a plaintiff in a civil or small claims case may not sit as a judge pro-tem during the case or within six months following its resolution, nor one named as a defendant in two or more such cases (Rule 11.22). Rules 11.1, 11.3 to 11.5, 11.7 to 11.18, 11.20 and 11.21 are repealed, and Rule 11.6 (voluntary arbitration; see Local Rule 10.2) was repealed and renumbered.
Duval County's indigent-defense and magistration rules under the Texas Fair Defense Act (S.B. 7): who may be booked into the county jail and on what paper; arrest-case numbering; presentment to a magistrate within 48 hours (art. 15.16); the magistrate's warnings, counsel inquiry, interpreter duty, indigence determination and appointment of counsel within 24 hours of a request; the alternative appointment plan under art. 26.04(g)-(h) with annual applications, seven attorney categories (capital, first and second degree, third degree/state jail/misdemeanor, competency, appeals, post-conviction, extradition), CLE and experience standards, random rotation within each category, written acceptance within 48 hours, first contact by the end of the next working day, replacement and suspension of counsel, fee applications within five days of completing services and the compensation attachment ($500 pleas; $175/$150 hourly; $1,400 per jury-trial day; appellate caps); bail schedules by offense class with a personal bond office (fee $20 or 3%), pre-trial supervision and revocation hearings within two working days; arraignment settings and notice; repeal of conflicting rules.