Thirteenth Cir. — S-1992-200-i · BenchPath

Thirteenth Cir. — S-1992-200-i

High confidence· verified July 26, 2026Administrative OrdersThirteenth Judicial Circuit, S-1992-200-i — harvested live and sha256-hashed 2026-07-24

Summary

1 verbatim mandatory provision from S-1992-200-i.

Applies to

Thirteenth Judicial Circuit. Check the order's own effective and rescission dates before relying on it. Procedural information only; not legal advice.

Requirement

Verbatim from the operative section of this order, re-extracted 2026-07-26; whitespace normalised only. • Any organization or individual that seeks the use of courthouse facilities under the control of the chief judge shall: A. Make written application to the court administrator; B. State the name of the entity seeking such use; C. State the purpose of such use; and D. Receive written permission for such use from the chief judge or the chief judge’s designee. • Any user of courthouse facilities may be assessed a fee to pay to Hillsborough County any additional, direct costs, such as utilities or security, that are incurred by Hillsborough County as 1 2 a result of such use.

Source of truth

Any organization or individual that seeks the use of courthouse facilities under the control of the chief judge shall: A. Make written application to the court administrator; B. State the name of the entity seeking such use; C. State the purpose of such use; and D. Receive written permission for such use from the chief judge or the chief judge’s designee.

Official source: 13th Cir. — Hearing Officers directory
Source health: Healthy · checked September 8, 2026
Effective date: —
Last verified: July 26, 2026benchpath-reextract-2026-07-26

Reviewer note: Document sha256: 12cf2209c8c0c0331a5f8d325e30e9a9506996ee195095c819ab88470a7228fa (10685 bytes). BenchPath harvested this circuit itself because no research corpus existed for it. Extraction is conservative: mandatory-language sentences only, so this rule is a faithful subset of the order, never a summary of it. | Set to in_review 2026-07-26: the order's subject looks practitioner-facing but the extracted text captured only recitals or an effective date, not the operative ORDERED section. This is an extraction defect, not a judgement that the order is unimportant — it needs re-extraction before it goes back on the published surface. | Re-extracted 2026-07-26 from the numbered paragraphs following the order's ORDERED clause, replacing a first pass that had captured recitals and the effective date.

Change history

August 6, 2026Monitor: content changed at 13th Cir. — Hearing Officers directory. Review before republishing dependent rules.
August 4, 2026Monitor: content changed at 13th Cir. — Hearing Officers directory. Review before republishing dependent rules.
August 3, 2026Monitor: content changed at 13th Cir. — Hearing Officers directory. Review before republishing dependent rules.
August 2, 2026Monitor: content changed at 13th Cir. — Hearing Officers directory. Review before republishing dependent rules.
August 1, 2026Monitor: content changed at 13th Cir. — Hearing Officers directory. Review before republishing dependent rules.
July 31, 2026Monitor: content changed at 13th Cir. — Hearing Officers directory. Review before republishing dependent rules.
July 30, 2026Monitor: content changed at 13th Cir. — Hearing Officers directory. Review before republishing dependent rules.
July 29, 2026Monitor: content changed at 13th Cir. — Hearing Officers directory. Review before republishing dependent rules.
July 27, 2026Monitor: content changed at 13th Cir. — Hearing Officers directory. Review before republishing dependent rules.